Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
Answer:
D. Tour Guide
D. Tour Guide
A. Hotel Clerk
C. Waitress
Explanation:
these are the direct and indirect careers related to hospitality and tourism. with the development of productive communications and travelling facilities, hospitality and tourism industry is one of the fastest growing sectors in any economy.
Answer:
2129 futures contracts to be sold
Explanation:
Asset worth = $310 million
Asset duration = 12 years
liabilities = $248 million
Liabilities duration = 5 years
T-bond futures contracts = 104-20 (30nds)
% of assets = 310 / 248 =
<u>Determine how many futures contracts Village Bank will sell to fully hedge the balance </u>
Number of Contracts = -[Assets * (Asset Duration – (Liabilities Duration * % of Assets) / (Duration * Contract Value)]
= - [ 310 * ( 12 - ( 5 * (310/248)) / ( 8 * ( 104 + ( 20/30)) ]
= - [ 310 * ( 12 - 6.25 ) / ( 8 * 104.6667 ) ]
= - [ 310 * 5.75 / 837.3336 ]
= - 2.12878 * 1000
= 2128.78 ≈ 2129 ( number of futures contracts to be sold )
CVP analysis is more difficult because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.
<h3>What is a
CVP analysis?</h3>
This is an analysis that find out how changes in the firm's variable and fixed costs affect the firm's profit.
Hence, the analysis is difficult when using absorption costing than when using variable costing because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.
Read more about CVP analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/26654564</em>
Yes debit card are more. Preferred because when you use a debit card you pay on the spot but when you use your credit card it tends to build up and you will have to pay your bill