Answer:
A. Pangeans are historically untrustworthy.
Explanation:
The speaker's point of view is most likely that Pangeans are historically untrustworthy. At the beginning of the passage, he states that Pangea has long yearned to possess their resources. That's why he thinks they're likely to attack. Based on the following statements, we can conclude that Pangeans already tried defeating them. He doesn't explicitly state that it was them who attacked (<em>We have never been defeated before </em>- he doesn't say by whom), but based on the context, we can make this conclusion.
The speaker says that his people will defend what is theirs, which means that they will respond to violence by violence. To him, war isn't the last resort for resolving conflict.
Democratic principles are something he obviously treasures (<em>what makes us fair-minded and democratic is our strong national character</em>), and he never says anything about suspending them during wartime.
This is why option A is the correct one.
Answer:
No,they will not state the central idea directly.
I don't really know. I've done this since I was 4 when I used to get nose bleeds that lasted a good while. I got them until I was an adult when a specialist cotterized(sp?) a blood vessel in my nose. I got them even then, but not as often and not as persistently.
I also put ice cold ice packs on my forehead.
I suppose you are swallowing blood that has been exposed to the air. That means it is carrying oxygenated blood. Other than being prohibited in the Bible, I don't see anything really wrong with it. When you look it up, it says that it can bring about vomiting. That never happened to me.
To prevent more work later
To ensure a proper works cited
To prevent any accusations of plagiarism
To ensure that all sources are always accessible
If I was given the chance to go to space, I would like see what it was like and how it feel to not have any gravity weighing me down. I would like to see if there are actually any cows that jump over the moon.
