Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can conclude that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI, because you can see/interpret that there all the angles are congruent with one another, like with vertical angles (∠GIH and ∠KIJ) and alternate interior angles (∠H and ∠J, ∠G and ∠K).
We also know that we have two congruent sides, since it provides the information that line GK bisects line HJ, meaning that they have been split evenly (they have been split, with even/same lengths).
<u><em>So now we have three congruent angles, and two congruent sides. This is enough to prove that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI,</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
We want to find the values of a, b, c, and d such that the given matrix product is equal to a 2x2 identity matrix. We will solve a system of equations to find:
<h3>
Presenting the equation:</h3>
Basically, we want to solve:
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&2\\a&1\end{array}\right]*\left[\begin{array}{cc}b&c\\1&d\end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\0&1\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D-1%262%5C%5Ca%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%2A%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7Db%26c%5C%5C1%26d%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D1%260%5C%5C0%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The matrix product will be:
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}-b + 2&-c + 2d\\a*b + 1&a*c + d\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7D-b%20%2B%202%26-c%20%2B%202d%5C%5Ca%2Ab%20%2B%201%26a%2Ac%20%2B%20d%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Then we must have:
-b + 2 = 1
This means that:
b = 2 - 1 = 1
We also need to have:
a*b + 1 = 0
we know the value of b, so we just have:
a*1 + b = 0
Now the two remaining equations are:
-c + 2d = 0
a*c + d = 1
Replacing the value of a we get:
-c + 2d = 0
-c + d = 1
Isolating c in the first equation we get:
c = 2d
Replacing that in the other equation we get:
-(2d) + d = 1
-d = 1
Then:
c = 2d = 2*(-1) = -2
So the values are:
If you want to learn more about systems of equations, you can read:
brainly.com/question/13729904
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The strange thing about the greatest integer function is that the number you are evaluating the function at is not actually the number unless its an integer. The rule is to round down, ALWAYS, if you are dealing with a value of x that is not an integer. In other words, you are NOT evaluating the function at 8.6, you have to round down to 8 and evaluate it there. 8 - 5 = 3