A code of ethics adopted by a company will most likely include all of the following EXCEPT

A cash-strapped young professional offers to buy your car with four, equal annual payments of $3,000, beginning 2 years from tod

kiruha [24]

Answer:

This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.

Explanation:

We need to first calculate what is the future value of payments in both scenarios. If we receive $9,000 today and invest it at 10% for 6 years we will have 9000*1.10^6=15,944

If we start reviving cash in 4 annual payments 2 years from now of $3000 we will have to find the future value of each individual payment and add them up.

First payment Future value = 3000*1.10^4=4392 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)

Second payment future value = 3000*1.10^3=3993 (Money can be invested for 3 years at 10%)

Third payment future value = 3000*1.10^2=3630 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)

Fourth payment future value = 3000*1.1=3300

Add them all up = 15315

This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.

5 0

3 years ago

A survey of 50 retail stores revealed that the average price of a microwave was $375 with a sample standard deviation of $20. As

ohaa [14]

Answer:

True cost of the microwave is in 99% confidence interval: $c. $323.40 to $426.60$

Explanation:

Relevant data:

$n=50\\\mu=375\\\sigma=20\\\alpha=0,001$

As we want to know the 99% confidence interval, the significance level is:

$(1-\alpha).100\%=99\%\\1-\alpha=0.99\\\alpha=0.01$

We need to estimate a confidence interval by a two tailed normal bell. Then we have:

$Z_{\alpha/2}=Z_{0.005}$

The z-value for a probability of 0.005 in a normal standard distribution is 2.576

Confidence interval is given by;:

$\=x\±Z_{\alpha/2}\sigma\\375\±Z_{\0.005}(20)\\375\±(2.58)(20)\\375\±51.60$

$375+51.60=426.60\\375-51.60=323.40$

True cost of the microwave is in 99% confidence interval: $c. $323.40 to $426.60$

6 0

3 years ago

You are the CEO of a company that has to choose between making a $100 million investment in either Russia or Poland. Both invest

dimulka [17.4K]

Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.

Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.

Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.

8 0

3 years ago

Consider four different stocks, all of which have a required return of 15 percent and a most recent dividend of $4.20 per share.

natka813 [3]

Answer:

Dividend yield for W = 5%

Dividend yield for X = 15%

Dividend yield for Y = 20%

Dividend yield for Z = 4.6%

Explanation:

For a constant growth stock $Price =\frac{D1}{r-g}$