Answer:
Option b
Explanation:
Fred in the scenario is demonstrating hindsight bias.
Hindsight bias is also referred as the phenomena of 'knew-it-all-along' and can be defined as the tendency of some people for the perception of the events or over estimation of one's ability to make predictions about the results of any event that could not have been probably predicted.
The hindsight bias might serve as the major cause of the generation of over confidence in an individual about the predictions of the events that can occur in the future.
Answer:
because they did not like each other
Explanation:
Answer:
Sounds like The Unknown behavior an There out look on life an The Control of the Nation That have an is taken folks Souls to destroy there I&M And making wicked an Nafarin Controlled choices against one another
Answer:
depends on what you`re asking
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
