Answer:
-$28.8.
Explanation:
Note, we were told,
- to assume the cost of a therm is $0.30
- the family uses 600 therms of energy annually.
<u>Savings on old furnace:</u>
- 600 * $0.30 * 0.80 (or written as 80%) = $144
<u>Savings on new furnace:</u>
- 600 * $0.30 * 0.96 (or written as 96%) = $172.8
Difference: $144 - $172.8 = -$28.8.
D) all of the above
explanation: because all of the answers reflect why some people make bad investments
Owner's equity at the beginning of the year is
Assets-liabilities
60,000−17,000=43,000
Owner's equity at the end of the year is
Beginning balance+revenues-expenses+additional investment-withdrawal amount
43,000+48,000−36,000
+8,000−9,000
=54,000
Owner's equity changed by
ending balance-beginning balance
54,000−43,000=11,000. ..answer
The court decided in favor of the McNamee because he did not have sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction, since Texas was not the focal point of the story.
Explanation:
The court gave his final decision in favor of McNamee. Clement has not received decision in favor of his though he suffered from distress and damage of his reputation in Texas. McNamee illustrated that he gave steroids to Clements who was an Texas citizen
Mc Namee was a citizen of New York. He did not have sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction. McNamee was a trainer. According to the national magazine there was no such detail of defamation was provided.
Hmm...I think Brainly is a place for asking/answering questions, not creating ads...hmm, oh well lol
