Answer:
its black? or is it just mine
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Pure competition spreads resources between many different
firms.
Explanation:
Pure competition is a market structure with many suppliers and many buyers. All the suppliers sell a homogeneous product. There is intense business competition among the suppliers. Other characteristics of pure competition include
- There are no dominant suppliers.
- There is ease of entry and exit into the market
- Suppliers/firms are price takers.
In pure competition, resources are shared among the many competing firms in the industry, unlike in a monopoly that has only a single supplier. Resources include raw materials and profits.
Answer:
$368,000
Explanation:
In order to appraise the property using the capitalization approach, we must first determine a net cash flow:
net cash flow = $48,000 - $3,600 - $15,000 = $29,400
Now we calculate the property value using the perpetuity formula:
property value = net cash flow / capitalization rate = $29,400 / 8% = $367,500 which we must round up to $368,000
A property is being appraised using the income capitalization approach. Annually, it has an estimated gross income of $48,000, vacancy and credit losses of $3,600, and operating expenses of $15,000. Using a capitalization rate of 8%, what is the property's value (rounded up to the nearest $1,000)?
Answer: b. $188,800 Blackwelder Company will allocates $188,800 to desk lamp production if the actual direct hours is 118,000.
We have the following:
Total Plant Overhead = $640,000
Total Estimated Direct labour hours = 400,000 hours
Actual labour hours for desk lamp = 118, 000 hours
![Factory overhead allocated = Overhead allocation Rate * Actual labour hours [/tex] [tex] Factory overhead allocated = $188,800 (1.6 * 118,000)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Factory%20overhead%20allocated%20%3D%20Overhead%20allocation%20Rate%20%2A%20Actual%20labour%20hours%20%5B%2Ftex%3C%2Fstrong%3E%5D%3C%2Fp%3E%20%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3E%5Btex%5D%20Factory%20overhead%20allocated%20%3D%20%24188%2C800%20%281.6%20%2A%20118%2C000%29%20)
Answer:
the net cost of debt to a firm is generally less than the cost of equity.
Explanation:
If we assume both, investor in firms and lender to firms want's a certain return x
because the lender return (the interest) are tax deductible the net cost of debt will be: x ( 1 - t)
where t is the tax rate being rate beteen 0 and 1
as 1 less a fraction will be less than 1 we can stablish that:
x > x(1 - t)
x is the cost of equity
while x(1-t) is the net cost of debt
therefore, the cost of debt is lower than cost of equity.
