Answer:
I completely agree with the first-person's response
Answer:
Athanasius thought of the gold as an opportunity to help people whereas John fled from the scene as if he was being chased by a monster thinking that taking gold out of somewhere was a sin.
Explanation:
Athanasius wanted to take the gold as he saw no sin in helping the neighbor population with it but everything John felt was fear as soon as he saw the gold.
John was a man of simple ethics and lifestyle and didn't want any complications to his life.
Athanasius was a man of his own doings and always liked to think otherwise. He believed the bag of gold was a gift from an angel.
John believed in changing things for people by on's hard work and determination.
Both the brothers varied with different perspectives on life.
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
Understanding that it was composed that long prior encourages me place it into point of view and perceive that ladies in those days had far less rights than current circumstances. It additionally causes me comprehend the opening location when she alludes to "mediocre ladies." Because she was a duchess and a portion of the others display were likewise of the gentry, she is basically tending to normal people, not attempting to affront them. Since this content came so ahead of schedule in the ladies' rights development, I can perceive how her message is to start making others mindful of the issue, as opposed to attempting to give an answer.
Answer:
The fallacy which the above sentence is an example of is:
B. overgeneralization
Explanation:
Overgeneralization is a type of fallacy in which a biased judgment or conclusion is drawn upon. Also, the evidence given to support the judgment does not contain sufficient evidence to prove itself. The judgment is based on some prior experience. In the above statement, the judgment about the author is made by his last book which brings to highlight overgeneralization fallacy in it.
