direct objects and indirect objects in the sentence are -
her opinion - D.O.
the class - I.O.
<h3>What is the difference between direct and indirect object?</h3>
A noun, pronoun, or noun phrase that gives the subject and verb in the sentence meaning is referred to as an object in a sentence. In English, there are two types of objects: direct things and indirect objects. The fundamental difference between direct and indirect objects is that direct objects are recipients of actions, whereas indirect objects are recipients of direct objects.
A direct object is the person or thing that directly perceives an action or impact of a verb. An indirect object is used to answer the queries "for what," "of what," "to what," "for whom," "of whom," or "to whom," and it is always present with a direct object.
To learn more about direct and indirect objects from given link
brainly.com/question/1427574
#SPJ4
Answer:
Chronological order
Explanation:
The recipe is organized in chronological order. This can be observed through the process of developing the cookies to which the recipe is referring, since this process follows a series of steps that take place one after the other in a well-defined and delimited sequence.
This sequence, where each stage takes place each in its time period that is established right after the execution of the previous stage is an example of a chronological order.
Looking up the word in the dictionary
Answer and Explanation:
Today's society is shaped and totally influenced by technological advances, which have efficiently improved our personal, economic, political and personal connections, facilitating very important processes for the establishment of efficient communities.
Technological advances have facilitated our form of communication, allowing us to access information much more quickly. In addition, this advance has optimized the population's health with the existence of increasingly specific and efficient machines, in addition to allowing an increasingly safe and fast movement and transportation.
Nevertheless, we can see a strong improvement process in the devices to which we are dependent. More and more efficient machines promote jobs, previously performed by human beings, more quickly and economically, promoting a strong automation of services. This has caused competition in the productive sectors and has caused many layoffs, but it has raised the speed and standardization of services like never before seen.
In this regard, we can conclude that technological advancement is very beneficial to our society, but it has caused social problems that must be compensated by public policies that promote technological advancement and the protection of the population.
