C is the 100% correct answer but D seems a little corect as well.
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
Private goods are those that individuals own and are destined to use for their use only. The owners have all rights on their properties up to the limits the local government imposes. Public services are those given to all individuals freely and can be used simultaneously or once at the time.
<em>The increase of private goods usually tends to demand for more public services societies must be intake care of.</em>
Answer:
Cost of merchandise sold = $ 28
Gross profit = $ 13
The ending inventory under the LIFO method = $ 18
Explanation:
Given:
October 5,
Purchased units = 1
Unit cost = $5
on October 12,
Purchased units = 1
Unit cost = $ 13
On October 28,
Purchased unit = 1
Unit cost = $ 15
Total cost of the 3 units purchased = $33
Now, the unit sold on October 31 will be the unit purchased in the end i.e on October 28
thus,
Cost of merchandise sold = $ 28
Gross profit = Selling price of the unit - Unit price of purchase
or
Gross profit = $ 28 - $ 15 = $ 13
now, the ending inventory under the LIFO method = $ 5 + $ 13 = $ 18
Answer: Charities; coordinating negotiations among all of the parties too costly
Explanation:
From the question, we are told that that a chicken farm uses a nearby stream to dispose of the wastes that is released by its chickens and that the wastes flow downstream into a lake that has become polluted due to the waste matter. The local office of a nonprofit environmental organization then collects enough donations in order to stop the farm's pollution.
The type types of private solutions to the pollution externality which has occured is charity. This is because it is a voluntary activity. The money collected is meant for a specific objective which is to tackle the issue of pollution.
It is also vital to note that sometimes the private solutions to externalities might not work. For example, this occurs when communications barriers or social customs are important enough relative to the potential gains involved that coordinating negotiations among all of the parties too costly.
Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
