Answer:
The impact of spending $50,000 on the research and development for a new drug to to cure liver damage will increase the expenses of the Morgan Pharmaceutical in the years financial statements.
Explanation:
Morgan pharmaceutical is pending $50,000 on he research and development of new drug which can cure the liver damage, from this spending company is expecting that after they have successfully created new drug it will lead to the increase in sales , which will ultimately lead to increase in profits , which then would totally recover the initial cost incurred on research and development but until then these expenses would be shown in the current years financial statement as expenses, and thus would increase the total expenses of the company.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Cost-benefit analysis".
Explanation:
The cost-benefit analysis also referred to as Benefit-cost analysis, is a strategic approach to evaluating the weaknesses and strengths of approaches used only to define solutions that provide the best strategy for generating advantages while retaining costs.
This can be used to assess implemented or future actions or to measure the benefit of decision, initiative or program costs.
Therefore, this will be the right answer.
Answer:
Journal entries to record the 2023 amortization expense for intangible assets.
Date Accounts Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Dec 31 Amortization Expense—Patents $14,180
($71,800*1/10 + $45,000 * 1/9
+ $40,000*1/10*6/12)
Patents $14,180
(To record amortization of patents)
Dec 31 Amortization Expense - Copyrights $6,335
($50,500*1/10 + $257,000*1/50*3/12)
Copyright $6,335
(To record amortization of copyrights)
Answer:
The answer is: John Akers would have probably fired the player and made the video public.
Explanation:
Akers firmly believed that ethics were fundamental to economic competitiveness. He argued that without ethical behavior, individuals, corporations and society as a whole couldn´t be economically competitive.
So in this case, he would have simply terminated the players contract without regarding any of the potential downsides for the team.
