Answer:
A) $56,750
Explanation:
Since Manning's ownership changed during the year, it must allocate income differently for the first 40 days than the remaining 325.
Kane should report the following income:
- 100% income form Manning x 40/365 = $73,000 x 40/365 = $8,000
- 75% income from Manning x 325/365 = $73,000 x 75% x 325/365 = $48,750
- total income allocated to Kane = $8,000 + $48,750 = $56,750
Answer:
PR is answerable for the collaboration of the corporate with the civilization, government, media, and consumer. Once a particular sort of event happens, confirm PR conveys in media that there'll be a reaction group selection to completely check the most explanation for the event whether or not it's a synthetic error or mechanism responsibility within the event. There’ll be a unbiased group are going to be conjointly selected to evaluate true and outcome and consequently given the results of the particular explanation for the event.
The answer would be A. central bank
Answer:
False
Explanation:
There is no restriction that prohibits the payment of dividends from a subsidiary to a parent company. The parent company has to report the subsidiary's profit as taxable income, so the subsidiary must pay its dividends to the parent company. To avoid multiple layers of taxation, parent companies can use the dividends-received deduction to reduce their taxes on the dividends received. Then the parent company must itself distribute dividends to its shareholders.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Perfect competition refers to a market structure under which there are large number of buyers and sellers each operating at a small level.
In such a market structure the supply curve is a horizontal line that depicts that whatever the quantity is the price will remain the same, that is, at the equilibrium level.
This happens due to the fact that there are large of number of participants present and no individual have the power to affect the price.
Thus, the correct option is C.
