I don’t know what timeline map you have, but it was for the expansion of American Democracy.
The idea was to train the South Vietnamese army to be able to handle the Vietnam armies themselves, <span>reducing the number of U.S. soldiers in Vietnam </span>
Answer: Very Bad.
Explanation:
The United States were a staunch supporter of Chiang Kai-shek who was the leader of mainland China as a Nationalist from 1928 to 1949.
In 1949, the Communists under Mao Zedong defeated Chiang and forced him to flee to Taiwan.
The US were wary of Communism and determined not to let it spread and so did not recognize the new Chinese state. They recognized Taiwan as China and even gave China's seat in the UN Security Council to Taiwan.
Various incidents highlighted how bad relations were between the 2 nations. Some of them included; the Korean War, the Taiwan Strait Crises, the Vietnam war and the Tibetan Crisis.
During the Korean War, China and the United States went against each other with China attacking United Nations forces which were mostly made up of Americans and the United Nations counter attacking. The conflict was so bad that General MacArthur called for a nuclear strike on China.
The Taiwan Strait Crisis almost saw the Nationalists who were allied to the US go to war with the Communists.
The Vietnam war saw the United States and the Chinese again supporting different sides of a conflict when the Chinese supported North Vietnam and the Americans, the South.
However during the late 60s, Soviet Russia and Communist China saw a thaw in their relationship as both subscribed to varying degrees of Communism. This saw minor border clashes but more importantly it convinced President Nixon to reach out to China. From 1967 onwards, the two countries began to negotiate a path forward which saw the games Ping Pong Diplomacy of 1971 where an American Ping Pong team came to play against a Chinese one.
If your friend is a business owner in a planned economy, then it would be the "central government" that decides how to allocate the productive resources he uses, since the government "plans" the economy as opposed to having supply and demand take place in the marketplace.
The correct answer is: Serbs would not have tried to eliminate other groups.
In the 20th century, Yugoslavia was a country that hosted many different ethnic groups, of which the Serbs were the largest one. For this reason, and in general terms, political power was in the hands of Serbs, who used it to try to eliminate the other groups who were seen in the eyes of Serbian people as second-class citizens. This can be seen in the war of the Balkans during the 1990s in the aftermath of the fall of Communism when the Serbian nationalist Slobodan Milosevic committed the crime of genocide against Bosnian people.
If the demographic distribution among ethnic groups would have been similar, perhaps the most likely result would have been that the Serbs would not have tried to eliminate the other groups.
