Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Hey there,
Answer:
<span>Change from higher-risks to lower-risks investments
Hope this helps :D
<em>~Top</em>
</span>
Answer:
The price of the stock is $66.5
Explanation:
The constant growth model of the DDM approach will be used to calculate the price of such a stock today.
The formula for the constant growth model is,
P0 or V = D0*(1+g) / r - g
As the growth rate in the company's dividedn is negative, the growth rate will be -5%.
The price of the stock is,
P0 = 11.9 * ( 1 - 0.05) / 0.12 + 0.05
P0 = $66.5
Answer:
a) total revenue equals total cost.
Explanation:
The break-even point is the level of activity in which total revenue equals total cost. It can also be defined in terms of units sold for a year is as the fixed expenses for the year divided by the contribution margin per unit of product. Note that exactly at the break-even point, there is no profit or loss.
Therefore, the answer is alternative a).
Answer:
e. The company will take on too many high-risk projects and reject too many low-risk projects.
Explanation:
By using the WACC for discounting purposes in case of the higher risk projects the net present value would be greater in such cases and also the high discount rate is applied. It is easily accepted but at the same time it also rise the organization risk
Therefore in the given case, the option e is correct and the same is to be considered
