Answer:
c) the incentive structure accompanying market prices.
Explanation:
The invisible hand explains the unintentional social advantages of ego-interested actions of people, a term first proposed by Adam Smith in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, published in 1759, referencing it with respect to the distribution of revenues.Administrators offer multiple incentives, that are bonuses or encouraging variables that push the person to function effectively and in the long term interest of the principal. The incentive structures contain price / referral fees, annual bonuses and compensation for performance
The deadweight loss from a tax per unit of good will be smallest in a market with inelastic supply and inelastic demand.
The Deadweight loss refers to loss that occurs when supply and demand are not in equilibrium and thus, result in market inefficiency.
Usually, the value of the deadweight loss varies with the demand elasticity and supply elasticity.
So, when the demand or supply is inelastic, the deadweight loss of the taxation will be smaller because the quantity bought or sold varies less with price.
Therefore, the answer is B. because the deadweight loss from a tax per unit of good will be smallest in a market with inelastic supply and inelastic demand.
Learn more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/13719669</em>
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Harrison Enterprises currently produces 8,000 units of part B13.
Current unit costs for part B13 are as follows:
Direct materials $12
Direct labor 9
Factory rent 7
Administrative costs 10
General factory overhead (allocated) 7
Total $45
If Harrison decides to buy part B13, 50% of the administrative costs would be avoided.
To calculate whether it is better to make the par in-house or buy, we need to determine which costs are unavoidable.
Unavoidable costs:
Factory rent= 7
Administrative costs= 5
General factory overhead= 7
Total= 17
Now, we can calculate the unitary cost of making the product in-house:
Unitary cost= direct material + direct labor + avoidable administrative costs
Unitary cost= 7 + 5 + 5= $17
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Answer:
The materials equivalent units is 37,700
Conversion costs equivalent units is 32,480
Explanation:
The equivalent units of production for materials can be computed thus:
Description quantity % of completion Equivalent units
Completed units 29000 100 29000
(37700-8700)
Ending inventory 8700 100 <u> 8700</u>
total equivalent units for materials 37700
The equivalent units of production for conversion costs can be computed thus:
Description quantity % of completion Equivalent units
Completed units 29000 100 29000
(37700-8700)
Ending inventory 8700 40 <u> 3480
</u>
total equivalent units for conversion costs 32480
I applied 100% percentage of completion to ending inventory when determining materials equivalent units and 40% percentage completion when determining equivalent units for conversion cots as it given in the question
