Answer: Cross Shopping
Explanation: Cross shopping is a technique there a single consumer plays around different suppliers to get the goods of his/her liking. It involves having conflicting needs and purchasing premium and budget products. In this case,Calvin loves eating at mcdonald's claiming they have the best fries, but for dessert he likes to eat cakes only at kaminsky's. Since, Calvin is shopping from different suppliers to get the products of his liking his behavior will be called cross shopping.
Answer:
NPV = $49,234.16
Explanation:
The Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the Present value (PV) of cash inflows and the PV of cash outflows. A positive NPV implies a good investment project and a negative figure implies the opposite.
NPV of an investment:
NPV = PV of Cash inflows - PV of cash outflow
<em>Present value of cash inflows:</em>
A × 1-(1+r)^(-n)/r
A- annual cash inflow-20,000 r-rate of return-10%, n-number of years-6
PV of cash flow = 20,000 × (1.1)^(-6)/0.1 = 87,105.21399
<em>PV of scrap value</em>
F× (1+r)^(-n)
F- scrap value
= 2,000× 1.1^(-6)= 1,128.94
Initial cost = $39,000
NPV = 87,105.21399 + 1,128.94 -39,000= $49,234.16
NPV = $49,234.16
Answer:
when CWC gives Richie a warehouse receipt for the widgets
Explanation:
Answer:
Stronger
Explanation:
Given that inflation affects trade flows, as the higher price of commodities have negative impacts on exports rates. Thus, all things being equal, it is expected that high inflation should cause downward pressure on the exchanger rate of Krendo.
Hence, the inflation effect will be STRONGER than the interest rate effect in influencing the exchanger rate of Krendo against the U.S. dollar.
Answer: d. Decision-making lag
Explanation:
When policy makers have identified that there is a problem that needs fixing but cannot seem to agree on the way forward, this is known as a <em>Decision - Making Lag or simply the Decision Lag.</em> It is one of the 3 specific inside Policy Lags and can be devastating due to the uncertainty of time it might take.
For instance, the economists suggesting dropping the federal funds rate by 0.25% might have the backing of one half of the Fed and the other Economists, the other half. Arguments could therefore go on for weeks before a decision is made.