The difference between 2D and 3D thinking is that two-dimensional thinking refers to flat, representative concepts. The three-dimensional reaches a deeper meaning.
<h3 /><h3>What is 3D thinking?</h3>
It means a way of thinking more broadly beyond your converging thoughts to solve problems. In other words, it constitutes a form of orientation and development of thoughts in an expanded way, generating innovation.
The 3D thinking expands the individual's vision beyond what is already identifiable and established, generating creativity and critical thinking.
Therefore, 3D thinking can be a useful skill for academic training and in the workplace, where there is a need to identify solutions to complex problems.
Find out more about critical thinking here:
brainly.com/question/6034421
Answer:
19 -B --> makes the most sense based on the events in the diagram
20- C --> this is a long-term effect
The treaty of Versailles was a bad idea. It benefited countries like Britain, France and America as they where the top powers to come out of the war. It blamed all of the damages caused to their countries squarely on the Germans simply because Germany was the best target. The German where forced to surrender all their foreign lands. They where forbidden from entering the Rhineland. They where forbidden from uniting with Austria. They where forced to pay reparations to the winning side after the war, leaving the German people and the Wiemar republic in poverty! If it wasn't for all these terms suppressing Germany, Hitler would never pushed the boundaries of the treaty, the Nazi's where unlikely to ever rise to such power as they where elected as a last hope when Germany lost faith in democracy and therefore Britain would not have had to declare war on Germany for taking over Poland and Slovakia, entering the Rhine and uniting with Austria. It is often said that WW1 was just a build up to world war two, as if it wasn't for the treaty of versailles none of this was ever going to or even had a possibility f happening.
Answer:
B. The US had never lost a naval battle before the battle in Guam.
Answer:
Asset privacy
, Favorable tax laws
, Shareholder anonymity
Explanation:
