Answer:
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
Explanation:
A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term."
This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism? It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.The senator's argument says that the condition which is low unemployment in the state is the effect of his economic packages, but the condition existed before he ever had the chance to introduce those packages. That is the major flaw of this argument.
Answer:
This is an example of: <u>a sample survey.</u>
Explanation:
In the experiment to determine the effect of sleep deprivation on the ability of the student to concentrate definitely needs an experimental setup rather than a randomized data collection.
<em>Do to the fact that, the experimental used a small sample sized area (Students in a calculus class) to test his hypothesis shows that the setup is a sample survey. </em>
<u>This sample survey result could be extrapolated to the whoe region (the classes in the school or whole school ) to determine if there was a major significance between the two variables.</u>
Answer:
Allport's personality trait theory
Explanation:
Unlike some other approaches to studying personality, trait approaches focus on – rather than on – of behavior. these approaches emphasize – that remain generally consistent in a person. examples of trait approaches include Allport's personality trait theory and eysenck's biological trait theory.
Answer: heredity; environment
Explanation:
There is a much better appreciation now for the influence that
environment (things like nutrition, schooling, enriched stimulation, etc),can have on intelligence - intelligence can change!
(reaction range is the name of the outer limits set by heredity)
Answer:
D). The star is getting farther away.
Explanation:
As per the question, the redshift of a star implies that 'the star is moving farther away'. It is described as the modification or increase in light's wavelength due to experiencing electromagnetic radiation from a specific object. In this effect, <u>the objects(in the space) move apart from each other as Hubble's law states the consequence of redshift i.e. leading to cause an increase in rate in their distance from the Earth.</u> Thus, the redshift of a star imply that 'the stars are moving farther away from the planet. Hence, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
