Answer:
By controlling supplies, OPEC nations were able to set the prices for oil.
Explanation:
OPEC which is an acronym of Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was established in1960 by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela and has been increased to fifteen countries presently through the controlling of supplies.
OPEC nations were able to set oil prices to have control over the demands and supplies. This helps the OPEC members, with the belief that controlling oil supplies leads to equal aggregate demands and supply thereby leaving no surplus of oil.
Hence, the collaboration generates more money for the members of OPEC
A statistically significant result indicates that your findings are not likely due to chancea statistically significant result indicates that your findings are not likely due to chance.this is a true statement.
Statistical significance provides a cut-off value for determining whether a sample's results and observable effects are primarily due to screening and accurately represent the characteristics of the study population.This significance threshold is often 0.05-5%, regardless of the need for documentation. This is because the implications of our findings recognize the importance of both Type I and Type II errors. When we say that a result is "statistically significant", we mean it is statistically significantly different from 0.
There is usually a null hypothesis that the parameter is equal to zero. Through statistical analysis, tests can be performed to prove that such parameters are statistically significantly different from zero. Therefore, you should know that this value is statistically significantly different from 0 when viewed in text.
Learn more about statistical significance here:
brainly.com/question/15848236
#SPJ4
1. employee theft and abusive behavior
2. steals time from your employer
3. self - discipline , teamwork , dedication , productivity , reliability
4. talk to program coordinator
5. to give feedback to know what is right and wrong about the persons work
He didnt think the US should tie themselves to any European power.
issues could come about if England wanted to get involved in any territories.
if they sided with one Britian it Would be directly hypocritical of their practice and staement about being free from European affairs being seperate entities.it would go against their statement of being independent from foreign affairs