Answer:
c. skimming pricing
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Xerox was using a skimming pricing strategy to help recover the cost of its research and development. This is a pricing strategy in which the company places a really high initial price for it's new product, but then goes lowering the price as time passes. This also makes individuals believe that they are getting a bargain when prices begin to drop and decide to buy more.
Answer:
1 million.
Explanation:
Employers are generally allowed to deduct reasonable compensation paid to employees, but the level of deductible compensation is limited to a maximum of $ 1,000,000 for the CEO, CFO, and the next three highest paid officers of publicly traded corporations unless certain exceptions are met.
Answer:
maybe August
Explanation:
school opens in August, so, maybe then?
Hope you have a great day
Answer:
d. 0.8% and 1.3%.
Explanation:
The default risk premiums on the bonds issued by Shell = 6.5% - 5.7% = 0.8%
The default risk premiums on the bonds issued by Ford = 7.5% - 6.2% = 1.3%
Hence, the default risk premium issued by Shell and Ford respectively are 0.8% and 1.3%
Answer and Explanation:
a. This is a fundamental risk case since there is a loss possibility. As the attack is done by the terrorists and the loss is definite in terms
b. It is a property risk as the house is damaged in a fire that resulted into a financial loss
c. It is a personal risk case as the head of the family is totally disabled that directly impact the family which leads to non-fulfillment of the financial liabilities so ultimately its an income loss.
d. It is a case of speculative as the investor purchase 100 shares that resulted in either profit or loss
e. This is a case of fundamental risk as the overflow of the river impacts the property of thousands people
f. This is a case of financial risk as the risk impacted the opposite changes in the price of the commodity, rate of interest, etc
g. It is a speculative case as the worker could either win or loss
