1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ahat [919]
3 years ago
7

My opponent says we should respect the values that have guided us in the past and draw strength from them. But this election isn

’t about the past; it’s about the future. I am the candidate that wants to lead us to a better, brighter future. So you can either vote for my opponent and a return to the past, or you can vote progress by voting for me.
Does it commit a fallacy? Does it commit a missing the point fallacy?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Ivahew [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The summary according to the given scenario is summarized below.

Explanation:

  • This same case eventually commits mistakes as well as the seriously lacking moment in time mistakes. That was because supporting in favor of the aforementioned individual will ensure that advancement is not reasonable.
  • There seems to be no factual evidence throughout the assumption that the adversary will drag society towards history if any individual is appointed.
You might be interested in
A person you recently met in one of your classes tells you that she was adopted shortly after her birth. This is an example of
Assoli18 [71]

Explanation:

This is an example of self- disclosure .

4 0
3 years ago
Who was the first celebrity to appear on sesame street?
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

James Earl Jones

Explanation:

He was on Sesame Street in 1969

7 0
3 years ago
When presented with Stanley Milgram’s experimental design, a group of experts and lay people estimated that approximately 1 perc
Fantom [35]

Answer:

65%

Explanation:

In 1963, Stanley Milgram conducted an experimental design in which he wanted to research the extent to which any individual could go to show his obedience about harming other people. The experiment was primarily conducted to figure out the influence which leads an individual to commit such heinous crimes and atrocities.

6 0
3 years ago
Which two statements explain how the 2018 farm bill and federal crop insurance act transformed hemp policy in the united states?
natta225 [31]

The two statements which described the Farm Bill and Federal Corp Act changing the hemp policy in US country exist the approval of hemp cultivation for the production of medical marijuana and permitting the farmers to transport hemp across the state.

<h3>What is 2018 Farm bill?</h3>

The 2018 farm bill or Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 stands as a legislated United States farm bill that reauthorized $867 billion for numerous expenditures approved in the prior farm bill. The bill existed enacted by the Senate and House on December 11 and 12, 2018, respectively.

It is an agricultural Improvement Act that existed formed in 2018. Here, cannabis existed legalized for cultivation and sales, and cannabis was redefined with the bill. Therefore, the two statements that defined the 2018 farm act are that it agreed on national hemp cultivation for producing medical marijuana and it became legal for agriculturalists to transport hemp across state lines.

The complete question is,

Which two statements explain how the 2018 Farm Bill and Federal Crop Insurance Act transformed hemp policy in the United States?

It authorized farmers to grow hemp without a license.

It approved national hemp cultivation for producing medical marijuana.

It became legal for farmers to transport hemp across state lines.

It allowed hemp farmers to buy insurance if their hemp crops were destroyed.

It permitted hemp farmers to avoid Chinese tariffs.

To learn more about 2018 Farm bill refer to:

brainly.com/question/27268458

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Curtis filed a lawsuit against Ulhoff for failure to repay $1,000 according to the terms of a promissory note. The trial ended b
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

d. We don't know who wins yet because the case is being returned to the trial court for additional steps

Explanation:

Curtis filed a lawsuit against Ulhoff for failure to repay $1,000 according to the terms of a promissory note. The trial ended before it began, with the trial judge granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of Curtis. Ulhoff has appealed, and the Supreme Court of Iowa has remanded the case. This means we don't know who wins yet because the case is being returned to the trial court for additional steps.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WHY IS IT IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED ABUSE YOU DO NOT REPORT
    14·1 answer
  • Most Americans outside the South were horrified when they saw television coverage of the mistreatment of blacks.
    5·2 answers
  • Christina is in the eighth grade and is taking pre-algebra. she is doing very well and will be taking algebra 1 next year. chris
    6·1 answer
  • A portion of the population selected to represent the population is called
    12·1 answer
  • If you are taking a prescribed drug and are going to drive, __________.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about AP classes.
    15·2 answers
  • HELPPPP! <br> I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • How does the author convey the central idea selected in Part A? by providing scientific data on the physics and structure of the
    10·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP. IM GIVING BRAINLIEST AND 50 POINTS TO FIRST CORRECT ANSWER) Which river do you think is more polluted? Chiang Jian
    14·2 answers
  • How to explain the (pay pal) system according to the concept of “creative destruction”
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!