Answer:
A person who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision can <u>appeal to a higher court.</u>
Explanation:
A person can appeal to a higher court but it doesn't mean the court is going to change his decision. There is a time from the sentence to the conviction, time for a person to appeal.
Stare decisis can be defined as a legal doctrine whereas eminent domain refers to the power of the federal government or state.
The differences between stare decision and eminent domain are as follows:
- Stare decisis is used as a benchmark to deal with similar cases whereas eminent domain creates a standard of dealing with private property cases.
- Stare decisis can be overruled according to the requirement of the case whereas the eminent domain cannot be overruled.
- Stare decisis helps in dealing with cases whose judgement is not simple whereas eminent domain helps in deriving land from private owner for the sake of public construction.
Learn more about stare decisis:
brainly.com/question/21085371
Answer:
2nd one.
Explanation:
blood evidence should be tested immediately before effected by the environment to collect dna and calculate blood splatter angles. blood is more reliable than weapons as we cant always prove it was in possession of the offender at the time. if its a ballistic weapon that can be tracked through the serial number the weapon is not first priority. as they are not effected greatly by the environment as bio fluids are.
I would say interest groups
Answer:
The four elements that a plaintiff must prove to win a negligence suit are 1) Duty, 2) Breach, 3) Cause, and 4) Harm
Explanation: