Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
Answer:
Girls are more likely to post harmful videos or pictures, while boys are more likely to spread rumors.
Explanation:
Spreading rumors can not be aimed at bullying anyone person . It targets at wide spectrum of people. So spreading is not covered under cyber bullying .
The First Amendment, The Third Amendment, The Fourth Amendment, and The Fifth Amendment
Explanation:
- The First Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." U.S. CONST. amend. I
- The Third Amendment reads: "No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." U.S. CONST. amend. III
- The Fourth Amendment, in its entirety, states: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation and specifically describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." U.S. CONST. amend. IV.
- The Fifth Amendment states, "No person, shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." U.S. CONST. amend. V
Answer: Consent or reason to perform a search for the safety of others, the officer must be the same Gender of the individual they are searching, such as a male officer cannot search a female.
