Answer:
The teacher asked the little girl if she had taken her lunch.
Is it the Frankenstein book? And if it is here: He accused Victor of leaving him alone in a world that did not want or understand him. The creature demand Victor create a mate for him so he would not be alone, promising he and the new creature would flee to South America and avoid people forever.
Here you go✨
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
I can not give a straight answer but I know it is either B. or C. You can choose the one you think is best. Hope this helped ^-^
Yes you would use crumpled in that sentence
