sold 500 tickets therefore it is not economically efficient
Jim can recover even if he was negligent and violated the employer's rules.
Option D is correct.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Employee compensation is a system that is publicly sponsored and pays financial benefits to employees who are injured during their work. The coverage of the employee is an insurance form that provides compensation for accidents or handicaps suffered by its employees.
The workers ' compensation act guaranteed that all employees injured at work received daily insurance and paid for hospital costs. By return, disabled workers earned the right to sue their bosses and supervisors for wrongdoing and earned the right to claim damages for pain and misery.
The payment for employees is basically a scheme of no consequence if the wounded employee is not at issue with the negligence of its own responsibility or the misconduct of his or her boss or friends, but only for his or her labor-related injuries is included in the injured workplace.
Answer:
Radically innovative.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Links Cable Network has decided to offer a one-hour appointment window for customers needing installation or repair of its service, which will require the company to have several technicians on call. Links hopes this practice will give it an advantage over the competition, none of which have adopted such a practice. Links Cable Network is introducing a radically innovative change.
A radically innovative change is a strategic business approach aimed at developing the business drastically.
Answer:
No
Amos McCoy is earning an economic loss. His implicit cost ($200) is greater than his accounting profit ($100)
Explanation:
Economic profit it accounting profit less implicit cost.
Accounting profit is total revenue less total cost or explicit cost.
Implicit costs are opportunity costs.
Economic profit = $100 - $200 = $-100
Amos McCoy Is making an economic loss of $-100
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
A. Competitive markets face perfectly elastic demand and marginal revenue, while monopolies face downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue.
Explanation:
In the case when competitive firms and monopolies generated at the level in which the marginal cost is equivalent to marginal revenue keeping the other things constant so the price should be less in the competitive market as compared to the monopoly because in the competitive markets it face perfectly elastic demand but in the monopoly it face the down ward sloping demand curve
Therefore the option a is correct