All categories

3 years ago

Combining a protective put with a forward contract generates equivalent outcomes at expiration to those of a:

Business

1 answer:

Juliette [100K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Fiduciary call.

Explanation:

Foreign exchange market can be defined as type of market in which the currency of one country is converted into that of another country.

For example, the conversion of dollars of the United States of America can be converted into naira (Nigeria) at the foreign exchange market.

A covered interest arbitrage can be defined as trading strategy in which an investor minimizes his or her currency risk by using a forward contract to hedge against the interest rate difference between two countries i.e the exchange rate risk. Thus, it's considered to be the most common interest rate arbitrage around the world.

Generally, when a protective put is combined with a forward contract it would generate equivalent outcomes at expiration to those of a fiduciary call.

This ultimately implies that, a fiduciary call combines both a call option and a bond that's risk free and matures on the expiry date of an option.

You might be interested in

Compared to a perfectly competitive firm, the demand schedule of a monopolistically competitive firm faces is:________

Volgvan

Compared to a perfectly competitive firm, the demand schedule of a monopolistically competitive firm faces <u>downward-sloping demand curves</u>.

A monopolistic market is a theoretical situation that describes a marketplace in which only one agency might also provide products and services to the public. A monopolistic market is the other of a perfectly competitive marketplace, in which an endless variety of companies function.

Monopolistic opposition exists while many businesses offer competing products or services which might be similar, but not best, substitutes. The barriers to access in a monopolistic competitive industry are low, and the choices of anyone firm do now not directly have an effect on its competition.

A monopoly has management over the supply of the product but though it can are seeking to influence the demand, it does not have management over it. In truth, a monopoly has to make a preference. it may set the price, but then it has to just accept the extent of income, consumers is prepared to buy at that fee.

Learn more about monopoly here: brainly.com/question/13113415

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is an example of crowding out? Question 13 options: A decrease in the rate of growth of the money supply

Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

A budget deficit causes an increase in interest rates, which causes a decrease in investment spending.

Explanation:

In domain of economics, crowding out

can be regarded as a phenomenon which take place as a result of increased in involvement of government in market economy sector which substantially has effect on remainder of the market, this effect could be on the supply side, it could be on demand side of the market. An example of crowding out is A budget deficit causes an increase in interest rates, which causes a decrease in investment spending.

7 0

3 years ago

Eva, the owner of eva's second time around wedding dresses, currently has five dresses to be altered, shown in the order in whic

AlladinOne [14]

The correct answer is 2.2 hours.

I<span>f Eva uses the earliest due date priority rule, the order of the dresses will be as follows: W (1 hour processing time, 1 hour due); Y (2 hrs processing time, 3 hrs due); V (3 hrs processing time, 5 hrs due); Z (5 hrs processing time, 7 hrs due); X (4 hrs processing time, 9 hrs due).</span>

It's easier to do the next step using real numbers. For example, if it's 11am now and W is due in 1 hour, then W is due at noon. If Y is due in 3 hours, then Y is due at 2pm, etc. Then, you need to use the processing time to see how long it will take to make the dresses. For example, since W takes one hour to process, it will be done by noon, its due date.

This means that W and Y will be altered on time, V will be 1 hour late, Z will be 4 hours late, and X will be 6 hours late. To find the average tardiness, add these extra hours (1+4+6) = 11, and divide by the total number of dresses (even the ones that weren't late) 5: 11/5 = 2.2 hours.

8 0

3 years ago

Hybrid cars are touted as a "green" alternative; however,the financial aspects of hybrid ownership are not as clear. Consider th

lord [1]

Answer:

the hybrid model initially costs $5,200 more than the regular model, plus you have another $330 in extra ownership costs per year. If you plan to own the hybrid car for 6 years, then you must recoup $5,200 / 6 = $866.67 + $330 = $1,196.67 per year.

the cost of driving 1 mile with the hybrid car = $3.60 / 27 = $0.1333

the cost of driving 1 mile with the regular model = $3.60 / 19 = $0.1895

you will save = $0.0562 per mile driven

you would need to drive $1,196.67 / $0.0562 = 21,293 miles per year to make the decision worth it

if you only drive 15,500 miles per year, then you would need to save $0.0772 per mile

that would only result if gasoline's price was:

x/19 - x/27 = 0.0772

0.0526x - 0.037x = 0.0772

0.0156x = 0.0772

x = 0.0772 / 0.0156 = $4.95 per gallon

you must first determine the present value of all additional expenses related to purchasing a hybrid:

year cash flow

0 -5,200

1 -330

2 -330

3 -330

4 -330

5 -330

6 -330

Using a financial calculator, the PV = -$6,637.24

now we must use an annuity formula to determine the annual savings required using a 10% discount rate and 6 periods:

annual savings = $6,637.24 / 4.3553 (PV annuity factor, 10%, 6 periods) = $1,523.95

so you must save $1,523.95 per year and that is equivalent to $1,523.95 / $0.0562 = 27,116.47 = 27,116 miles

you also need to save $1,523.95, but you only drive 15,500 miles, so the savings per mile = $0.0983

x/19 - x/27 = 0.0983

0.0526x - 0.037x = 0.0983

0.0156x = 0.0983

x = 0.0983 / 0.0156 = $6.30 per gallon

5 0

3 years ago

Meiji Isetan Corp. of Japan has two regional divisions with headquarters in Osaka and Yokohama. Selected data on the two divisio

abruzzese [7]

Answer:

Please check the info below

Explanation:

1. For Osaka

Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100

= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100

= 8.00%

Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100

= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100

= 4.00%

ROI = Margin * Turnover

= 8% *4 %

= 32.00%

Hence the correct answer is 32.00%

For Yokohama :

Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100

= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100

= 10.00%

Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100

= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100

= 2.00%

ROI = Margin * Turnover

= 10% *2 %

= 20.00%

Hence the correct answer is 20.00%

2. The correct answer is

Osaka = $ 371,250

Yokohama = $ 435,000

3. The correct answer is No

This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed

4 0

3 years ago