Answer:
- Passage 1 ⇒ Flashback
- Passage 2 ⇒ Flashback
- Passage 3 ⇒ Flashforward
Explanation:
Passages 1 and 2 are being spoken of as events that have already occurred and are being recounted. This makes them flashbacks which, as the term implies, refers to a narrative style where the narrator speaks of events in the past.
Passage 3 on the other hand is the opposite. It alludes to events that are yet to come which means that it is using a flashforward narrative style where one talks of events they believe will occur or that they want to occur.
Answer:
He is afraid of being infected. What horrors does the narrator witness during regular walks to his brother's house? People are dying on the streets, women shrieking and crying, and people do harm to themselves and others.
Explanation:
Answer:
The author was trying to convey the apathetic attitude of the rich towards the workingman.
Explanation:
The terms used by the author highlighted the negative ways the rich French class and the ruling class viewed the poor workingman. The term louts for example means an uncouth or aggressive person while the term Jack was used to describe the ordinary man who rendered services to the rich.
The author's use of these terms would help the reader to see how lowly the government thought of the poor to the extent that they failed to consider them and were taken unawares at the peasants' revolt.
Answer:
c) Jack will not understand the club’s decision unless he talks to Christopher.
Explanation:
A vague pronoun is a pronoun that does not clearly indicate which antecedent (or noun) it is referring to. All options, except option C, have a vague pronoun because in these sentences it is not clear whether “he” (the pronoun) is referring to the antecedent “Jack” or “Christopher.”
Option C, on the other hand, is the one that corrects the vague pronoun because it clearly states that the pronoun “he” refers to “Jack” only.
