<span>The point of view London uses in "The Call of the Wild" is the third person limited omniscient.
</span> Omniscient means that the narrator has access to character's thoughts and feelings
Buck’s point of view, for the most part; because London focuses on the character of Buck. He explains the <span>the dog's thoughts and feelings.</span> <span>
the novel also shifts briefly into </span>John Thornton’s point of view during his wager involving Buck’s ability to pull a heavy sled
I saw my friend henry walking to the store last Friday night. It was a rainy stormy night. Lighting stretching across the sky like a cat before it lies on its bed. All I heard was a "BOOM" and the next thing I saw was the store catch on fire. I ran at the speed of a cheetah into the building to see if anyone was inside. I found the store owner and dragged him out of the burning store like a drag of a baseball field. I was thanked and appreciated. The next morning I woke up and saw the headlines of the newspaper stating "Local hero saves Shop Owner."
Answer:
you didn't tell him the what??
Explanation:
Answer:he is manipulative corrupt and ambitious
<em>The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</em> is a fascinating novel written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and a little spooky which keeps the readers bind and interested.
The passage illustrates the character vs. character conflict.
<h3>The novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The passage lines are a dialogue between Lawyer Utterson and Doctor Jekyll. It shows the conflict between the two characters as they discuss giving everything to Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer disagrees with Dr Jekyll and says to him that Hyde is a terrible man. But the doctor does not agree with the lawyer and asks him to give all of his belonging to Mr Hyde.
Therefore, option 4. character vs. character is illustrated in the passage.
Learn more about The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
