Answer: John Steinbeck born 1902 was an American author that also won the Nobel prize for his realistic and imaginative writings.
He wrote lots of books and in one of his books, he described Migrants as dangerous new barbarians. This was during the great depression. What he meant by this text is that, a hungry migrant is hungry. But a migrant whose kids are hungry can be dangerous because this individual can go to any length to feed their kids. This indicates an action or behaviour that benefits another or others at some cost to the performer.
<span>One of the most persuasive tools the governor has is the threat of veto. This is very helpful because a threat of a veto will change the outlook of a bill long before it is presented to the President of the United States.</span>
Answer:
Correct answer is C: They both created strong centralized forms of government.
Explanation:
Both the Macedonian Empire, which began in truth with Alexander the Great´s father, King Phillip II (359-336), but which grew to become the most powerful in ancient times, thanks to Alexander´s prowess, from 338 till Alexander´s death in 323 B.C., and the Roman Empire, which initiated after the end of the Republic period, and which lasted far longer than any other empire (27 BC to 285 A.D.,) before it fragmented into two empires, The Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople and the Western Roman Empire, with its center based in first Milan and then Ravenna, had a common denominator that defined them and also made them unique; they established a strong and centralized system of government, with the center of government on their capital cities, that allowed them to keep constant control over their conquered lands and keep their power without any division of it. Both Alexander and the Roman emperors maintained full control of their empires in their hands, which eliminated in part the problem of fragmentation due to power struggles between other powerful people aside from themselves. This is why the correct answer is C.
Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
