Answer:
The relationship has the largest effect size.
Explanation:
So, we are given in the question above the following information or data;
(1). That the ''randomly samples 1,500 elderly men and women in Nashville, Tennessee (the state capital), located in the southern United States".
(2). Life satisfaction and experience of daily stress: r = −.57 (p = .01).
(3). "Number of friends one has and experience of daily stress: r = .09, not sig."
(4) ,"Number of friends one has and life satisfaction: r = .36 (p = .04) ".
Hence, if we compare all these correlations, Dr. Gomez will be most able to accurately predict life satisfaction from the experience of daily stress because the relationship HAS THE LAGEST EFFECT SIZE.
When people experience stress daily they develop lesser satisfaction. Scatterplot can be created for the relationship. So, if you look at the 3 correlations and the size given we can be be able to predict life satisfaction from the experience of daily stress
Answer:
c) critical thinking.
Explanation:
Critical thinking: The term critical thinking is defined as the tendency of an individual to make reasoned judgment that is being considered as well-though off and logical.
Critical thinking is defined as a way in which an individual thinks by not simply accepting every conclusions and arguments that he or she encountered yet carry an attitude of questioning the same.
In the question above, Melinda's concerns best illustrated critical thinking.
Specific Description. It's neither biased nor inappropriate, since both are factually true and informing about Stephanie. And it's not a cliched statement either.
People who have everything may not know the feeling of having nothing. The child who has nothing is willing to share because the child does not want someone to feel the same way that he/she did. Meaning, the poor child does not want someone to feel like they have nothing
Answer:
California, Hawaii, New Mexico and Texas
