What was the southern point of view about the expansion of slavery

EXPOSITORY WRITING write a paragraph explaining how life in the west was different from life in the west.

Len [333]

Answer: These differences can be noted for the most part in people's behavior and attitudes. The major difference between eastern and western culture is that people in the east are more conservative and traditional than the general population in the west. Life in the west was different from the life in the east because of people's culture,behavior and actions.

Explanation:

The difference between the westerners and the people living in the east is mainly the social, cultural and behavioral attitude. Westerners feel less complicated about the life and its rules. While the people living in the east is most concerned about the religious practices, culture and norms. They actually are more conservative and traditional while the people in west are super cool and easy. People in east are more preferred to actions and gestures, while westerners speak out frank what they really have in their mind.

Explanation: Hope this helps

8 0

3 years ago

No one but the ________ objected morally to slavery until the early 1800s.

DerKrebs [107]

Quakers

HOPE THIS HELPS GOOD LUCK :)

8 0

3 years ago

Which constitutional action starts the process by which a president is removed from office?

saw5 [17]

it D. The word "impeachment" derives from Old French empeechier from Latin impedicare expressing the idea of becoming caught or entrapped, and has analogues in the modern French verb empêcher (to prevent) and the modern English impede. Medieval popular etymology also associated it (wrongly) with derivations from the Latin impetere (to attack). (In its more frequent and more technical usage, impeachment of a witness means challenging the honesty or credibility of that person.)

Impeachment was first used in the British political system.<span>[citation needed]</span> Specifically, the process was first used by the English "Good Parliament" against Baron Latimer in the second half of the 14th century. Following the British example, the constitutions of Virginia (1776), Massachusetts (1780) and other states thereafter adopted the impeachment mechanism, but they restricted the punishment to removal of the official from office. As well, in private organizations, a motion to impeach can be used to prefer charges.<span />

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Spartans were educated and trained to be

Solnce55 [7]

Soldiers and/or warriors..

3 0

3 years ago

Help with this plsss

agasfer [191]

Answer:

only know the first one

Explanation:

Negotiation:

Representatives of US Government work with those from other countries to reach agreement on the substance, wording, and form of an international agreement. With more than 190 countries involved today, gathering wide support for a document can take years! The Government, under presidents from both parties, led the way in the negotiations for the CRC, resulting in a treaty inspired by US laws.

Signature:

If the President decides that a treaty is in the nation's best interests (and does not violate the US Constitution!), the President (or designated representative) will sign the treaty. Signing a treaty does not make it become law! It means that the US Government believes the treaty is a good idea, and commits the President to seeking ratification. Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright signed the CRC on behalf of the US in 1995.

Sending the Treaty to the U.S. Senate:

Once signed, the next step in the ratification process is to send the treaty to the US Senate, more specifically, to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. To do so, the State Department is responsible for putting together a package of documents to go along with the treaty, including:

Policy benefits and potential risks to the US;

Any significant regulatory or environmental impact; or,

Analysis of the issues surrounding the treaty's implementation, for example, whether the agreement is self-executing, or whether it needs domestic implementing legislation or regulations to abide by the treaty.

In addition, the State Department may propose a set of Reservations, Understandings, and/or Declarations (RUDS). These provisions include any specific additions, changes or deletions in the language and substance of the treaty that the US will require in order for it to ratify.

Senate Consideration and "Advice and Consent"

With the treaty package in hand, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee can begin its consideration. It can vote to send the treaty to the full Senate for action, with a favorable or unfavorable recommendation, or even without any recommendation at all; it can also decide to ignore the treaty entirely. However, if the Committee fails to act on the treaty, it is not returned to the President. Treaties, unlike other legislative measures, remain available to the Senate from one Congress to the next, until they are actively disposed of or withdrawn by the President.

When the Committee on Foreign Relations sends a treaty to the full Senate, the Senate considers whether to give its "advice and consent" or approval. That requires 67 votes, or two-thirds of the 100 Senators. The Senate may make its approval conditional by including in the consent resolution amendments to the text of the treaty, its own RUDS, or other statements.

Learn more about the Senate's role in treaties here.

Back to the President

Even if the Senate votes in favor of a treaty, there is still another step in the ratification process. Only the President, acting as the chief diplomat of the United States, has the authority to ratify a treaty. With the Senate's approval, the President can then move forward with the formal process of ratification. That means submitting documents giving the US Government's agreement to abide by the treaty, as well as any RUDS, to an institution (called a "depositary"). The deposit of the instruments of ratification establishes the consent of a state to be bound by the treaty.

5 0

3 years ago