Answer:
1) Expected return is 12.12%
2) Portfolio beta is 1.2932
Explanation:
1)
The expected return can be calculated by multiplying the return in a particular state of economy by the probability of that state occuring.
The expected return = (0.32 * -0.11) + 0.68 * 0.23
Expected return = 0.1212 or 12.12%
b)
The portfolio beta is the the systematic riskiness of the portfolio that is unavoidable. The portfolio beta is the weighted average of the individual stock betas that form up the portfolio.
Thus the portfolio beta will be,
Portfolio beta = 0.33 * 1.02 + 0.2 * 1.08 + 0.37 * 1.48 + 0.1 * 1.93
Portfolio beta = 1.2932
Answer:
The summary of the accident, calculate the total dollar value of the property damage Stephanie caused is explained below in detail.
Explanation:
The term 100/300/100 coverage indicates that a character has coverage of $100,000 physical damage mortgage coverage per person, $300,000 total physical damage mortgage insurance per accident, and $100,000 property loss accountability per accident.
So, in case Stephanie prompted a property and accident destruction, then $1,00000 will be sustained by the insurance corporation and above this value, it will be paid by Stephanie.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
Answer:
(a) rr: 1/3, cr: 0.5, m:1.8 M: 1800
(b) 1500
(c) 200
Answer:
They should operate Mine 1 for 1 hour and Mine 2 for 3 hours to meet the contractual obligations and minimize cost.
Explanation:
The formulation of the linear programming is:
Objective function:
Restrictions:
- High-grade ore: 
- Medium-grade ore: 
- Low-grade ore: 
- No negative hours: 
We start graphing the restrictions in a M1-M2 plane.
In the figure attached, we have the feasible region, where all the restrictions are validated, and the four points of intersection of 2 restrictions.
In one of this four points lies the minimum cost.
Graphically, we can graph the cost function over this feasible region, with different cost levels. When the line cost intersects one of the four points with the lowest level of cost, this is the optimum combination.
(NOTE: it is best to start with a low guessing of the cost and going up until it reaches one point in the feasible region).
The solution is for the point (M1=1, M2=3), with a cost of C=$680.
The cost function graph is attached.
