1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
8

What did the Compromise of 1877 accomplish for both political parties? Explain.

History
1 answer:
bonufazy [111]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can welp you sharing the following ideas.

With the Compromise of 1877, Democrats agreed to let Rutherford B. Hayes become the President of the United States and Republicans agreed to the withdrawal of federal soldiers from the South.

To settle the differences that resulted from the presidential election of 1876,  Republicans and Democrats negotiated to get an agreement that was called the Compromise of 1877. They decided that Rutherford B. Hayes become president, and Republicans agreed to the withdrawal of federal soldiers from the South. Democrat candidate Samuel Tilden accepted and the compromise was reached. This agreement also represented the end of Reconstruction in the southern states.

You might be interested in
Which of the following scenarios is an example of globalization but not
Kobotan [32]

Explanation:

ers in one region buy goods from sellers in another region within the

same country.

7 0
3 years ago
The Roman Empire was split into two sections because the citizens from the Eastern lands revolted and gained their independence.
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Attacks from barbarian tribes outside of the empire such as the Visigoths, Huns, Franks, and Vandals. In 285 AD, Emperor Diocletian decided that the Roman Empire was too big to manage. He divided the Empire into two parts, the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one power the supreme court has over the judicial court
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

The President (Executive Branch) has the power to appoint US Supreme Court justices and other (Article III ) federal judges. subject to approval by the Senate. He can and does choose judges who subscribe to his own legal philosophy and so can possibly shape future court opinions. The judges serve for life and their stance on future cases is hard to predict in many cases.

The president can also grant pardons for federal offenses

One is the fact that the judicial branch needs the executive branch to enforce its decisions. As an example, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional in Brown v. Bd. of Education of Topeka, it took the President's ordering the National Guard out to make some states abide by the ruling. The Judicial Branch has no way to enforce its decisions without the executive's co-operation.. Another is the fact that it is the executive branch that nominates the judges in the first place. As a practical matter, presidents nominate persons who share the same political beliefs they do. This has the effect of creating (or trying to create) a judicial branch that will interpret the Constitution the way that that president would like. Trouble is, once a Supreme Court Justice is confirmed, nothing can be done to force him or her to rule in a particular way. They are appointed with lifetime tenure on good behavior and their salaries cannot be diminished while they are in office.. And as to salaries, nothing says a president has to include raises for them in any budget he proposes.

The Executive branch gets to choose candidates for federal judgeships, including Supreme Court Justices. The President also has the power to pardon people convicted of federal offenses, Since the President controls the Department of Justice, he has some leeway in how laws are enforced.

8 0
4 years ago
Why did pastoral societies emerge only in the afro-eurasian world and not in the americas?
leonid [27]

Answer:

Why did pastoral societies emerge only in the Afro-Eurasian world and not in the Americas? There was a lack of large animals that could be domesticated in the Americas. ... Pastoral societies sought food stuffs, manufactured goods, and luxury items from agricultural societies.

Explanation:

hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Underground Railroad work?
Tomtit [17]
"<span>d// all of the above" are correct regarding the Underground Railroad. Although there were indeed several established paths, many paths had to be improvised to elude capture.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the main reason to have a vice president under the onstitutionn?
    13·1 answer
  • The Murray _____ is in eastern Australia.
    5·1 answer
  • Reason why boat are important?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did people move to specific towns? A. They united against Native American tribes. B. They all believed in a certain family.
    11·2 answers
  • Which describes a strike?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following would not support Darwin's research leading to the theory of natural selection?
    9·1 answer
  • 18. How many times was a volunteer expected to fire his weapon in<br>one minute?in the civil war​
    15·1 answer
  • How did Albany Plan of Union seek to involve the colonists in the French and Indian War?​
    12·1 answer
  • Which internal event signaled the end of the Soviet Union?
    12·2 answers
  • Quien fue Carlo magno?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!