1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
3 years ago
10

A sales representative in a shopping centre handed Karl a flyer promoting a style cut and shave for $12 at Lion’s Mane Barber Sh

op. As he was actually in need of a haircut and shave, Karl dropped by the barber shop, which was also located in the same shopping centre. When he arrived at the shop and presented his flyer to one of the barbers, he was told that there had been an error in the statement of price on the flyer - it was supposed to be $22 and not $12. The shop manager tried to convince Karl that this was still a bargain price given that a style cut and shave would normally cost $30 in other barbershops.
Karl got upset, as he passed by two other barbershops in the same shopping centre that sold haircuts and shaves for $20 to $25. If he had known about the supposed mistake in the Lion’s Mane flyer, he wouldn’t have bothered coming to the shop.

Answer the following:

(a) Does Karl have any legal grounds to claim the price of $12? (5 marks)

(b) Would your answer be different if Karl already had his hair cut and shave before being informed by the real cost of the services was $22? Does he have to pay the full price in this case? (7 marks)
Law
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.

a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.

he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.

b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.

You might be interested in
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do think capital punishment exists?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

answer in explanation

Explanation:

I believe that capital punishment exists because if someone were to murder somebody it is not fair that they are alive because they took the life of someone else

4 0
4 years ago
As a Police Chief and a servant of God, you need to help restore order to your community. What do you need to discuss with these
madam [21]

Being the new Police Chief and also a servant of God I would first remind myself that I never want to force my beliefs, but I also. ... With that in mind I would begin discussing with the community leaders what their main ... However, in order to restore order in my community it would be essential to treat the problems that the ...

8 0
3 years ago
An applicant for a position with a federal facility can be disqualified for _____.
ch4aika [34]
It could really be all of them. Federal Related jobs can be classified to the public eye and things like drug use and felony’s won’t get the job. Based on all of your possible answers, I am pretty sure it would be C. Felony’s are worse than misdemeanors as a Felony is a serious crime you can commit. Obviously all the other options would play a factor in getting the job. Probably should be a all answer but your best choice, is C. Good luck.
7 0
3 years ago
Keith Reed, a 15-year-old male with no prior arrests is brought in for questioning for larceny of several hundred dollars’ worth
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

it's sooo simple but so hard to explain but it's a

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • To which duty of a House member does this quote most likely refer?
    13·1 answer
  • The Framers of the US Constitution created two separate houses of Congress, each of which they expected would serve different co
    14·1 answer
  • 3 Points<br> Which of the following is a right of employees in the United States?
    12·1 answer
  • The right of the government to pass laws which affect the usage of property is?
    5·1 answer
  • In 2014 the number of homicides was what percent of the total number of crimes reported
    15·1 answer
  • Assume instead that, upon witnessing the lovers in each other's arms, Jill departs from the home and drives around in her car fo
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Which of the following can pose more danger to motorcyclists than to drivers?
    12·2 answers
  • Discuss the interesting aspects of the poem "government driver on his retirement​
    13·1 answer
  • A man walks into a bar orders a drink and asks the bartender why he chose that profession. The bartender tells him that you don'
    15·1 answer
  • Why is monitoring a major part of the work of the probation and parole officers?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!