Answer:
faulty eyewitness testimony.
Explanation:
its less likely to be a problem in trials involving more serious crimes such as murder.
the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.
The answer is d!! Hope this helped
B. We are human we make mistakes ;)
Answer:
Crassus's actions were unethical because he asked for payment first and withheld his help in putting out the fire until he received payment.
Explanation:
Marcus Licinius Crassus was a wealthy Roman who made his fortune from the buying of properties from those proscribed by the Sulla. This was done in such a way that, all the properties of the enemies are auctioned off at the cheapest price available.
Also, because of incessant fire outbreaks in Rome, Crassus established a 500 strong fire brigade men who helps in furthering his quest for richness. If a house is burning, those men will rush to the house but would do nothing till Crassus arrives.
He will offer the house owner to but the house at a ridiculous price. If the person accepts, the fire would be put out but if the person rejects, he will allow the whole house to burn to ground.
