1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
3 years ago
15

The Anti-Federalists were against

History
1 answer:
Alex73 [517]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Hey there!

The Anti-Federalists were against <u>expansion of national power. </u>

Explanation:

In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states.

You might be interested in
Describe how africa developed cultural under the auspices of european colonization movements.
NeTakaya
<span>The arrival of Europeans in Africa led to the dismantling of old cultural patterns and produced the introduction of new cultures and cultural exchange. Africa faces a new position of customs and traditions that enter with the colonizers and is reflected in the new traditions. However, after the process of decolonization of Africa, it is possible to recover old and own cultures.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Compare Texas vs Johnson and the first amendment
lyudmila [28]

In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.

Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.

Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.

7 0
3 years ago
What were the four New England colonies
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define the term Annex.<br><br><br><br>What did this term  mean for Mexico?
Eva8 [605]

The All of Mexico Movement (also called All Mexico Movement) was a political movement to expand the United States, so that it would include all of Mexico. It was an expression of Manifest Destiny but it never went into effect.

4 0
3 years ago
it was a mistake for the United States to make an alliance with the Soviet totalitarian communist union during World War II
omeli [17]

I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate.  An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.  

  • On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews.  The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism.  The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way.  Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.
  • On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan.  The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation.  They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war.  And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively.   (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)

So the matter can be argued from both sides.  Pick your side and write a strong essay!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are 3 values Josiah strong had
    15·1 answer
  • How Did the Ottoman empire responded to the non-Muslims
    6·1 answer
  • Il Duce was the title of which of the following leaders? A. Benito Mussolini B. Jozef Pilsudski C. Adolf Hitler D. Juan Péron
    7·1 answer
  • What Germanic tribe dominated Western Europe?"​
    9·2 answers
  • What was the major problem after Muhammad's death?
    10·1 answer
  • Under the terms of the treaty of versailles germany was forced to
    7·1 answer
  • How were family and community life differed by region in the New England Colonies
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT part of the Homestead Act of 1862?
    12·1 answer
  • Prior to the establishment of the ghettos, what regulations were put into place to reduce Jewish rights? (Be specific and identi
    10·1 answer
  • What did Wilson think was the most important action Germany could take ?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!