1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
3 years ago
15

The Anti-Federalists were against

History
1 answer:
Alex73 [517]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Hey there!

The Anti-Federalists were against <u>expansion of national power. </u>

Explanation:

In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states.

You might be interested in
How did the British colonies in the South Pacific differ from those in India?
alex41 [277]

Answer:

Explanation: They were more attractive to immigrants from Great Britain.

(I just know this from my textbook. No other information is present there.)

6 0
3 years ago
Synonyom for due process and majority rule
allochka39001 [22]
I would say justice and democracy.
5 0
3 years ago
What would most likely happen if the thames experienced a drought in the twenty-first century?
sattari [20]
The correct answer of the given question above would be option C. THE CITY'S WATER SUPPLY WOULD DECREASE. The city's water supply would most likely decrease if the Thames experienced a drought in the twenty-first century. Thames is a river that flows through southern England. Hope this answer helps.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the four reasons that we did nothing to stop hitler ​
sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

I believe 2 reasons are:

1.) The U.S didn't know what Hitler was doing until after the war

2.) The U.S wasn't sure how destructive he would be

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Dakota Sioux start an uprising in 1862? The government had not followed through with promises of help. The governmen
azamat

The correct answer is - The government had not followed through with promises of help.

The conflict resulted because of treaty violations by the United States government, and also by late or unfair annuity payments by the Indian agents. Throughout the 1950's this led to starvation among the Dakota (Sioux) people, and they were very frustrated about it.

Officially, thee conflict started when few Dakota hunters killed few white settlers that were also hunting, and afterwards the Dakota decided that they should kick out the white settlers from their territory and it is estimated that they killed around 800 men, women, and children. The US government responded with military action, captured lot of Dakota warriors, and some of them executed by hanging.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Napoleon Bonaparte want to sell the Louisiana Territory?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement describes the importance of the Bhagavad Gita? It is a medical text that describes Ayurvedic principles of heali
    5·1 answer
  • Why did labor change during the Industrial Revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of government?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the us defeat Germany first instead of japan
    10·2 answers
  • What 2 things do Conservatives believe in?
    7·1 answer
  • What country entering the NATO alliance sparked the creation of the Warsaw Pact
    9·2 answers
  • The Carlisle Indian School was one of many boarding schools built as part of the push for Americanization in
    11·1 answer
  • What was this ancient Chinese device used for?
    11·2 answers
  • Quién fue el presidente de México que llevó acabo el modelo de crecimiento económico acelerado
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!