Because They Could Not Attack A White Person Or The Cops Get Them
Answer:
the basic driver of West Africa's economy
Explanation:
the majority of people depends for their livelihood (Gyasi and Uitto-1997)
Most farms are/ were small with typically 1 through 5 hectares
Answer:
Explanation:
Comments
- Hitler tried it. How far did he get? Hitler never got to Moscow let alone further inland. Russia offers the following problems.
- It has a vast area to conquer.
- It has a good working industrial base. During WWII, Russia had that Industrial Base up and running. The problem from their point of view was that America's was better. I don't think that that's true now.
- Russia has an adequate army, air force and navy. Hitler relied on Blitzkrieg (which he thought he could conquer Russia quickly. It didn't turn out that way). which simply would not work on the Russian terrain. Many of Hitler's soldiers froze to death because he could not supply them with winter clothing. It would be that much harder now.
Answer: don't try it. It is better to wage economic war, but that seems like a poor idea to me. Russia's currency is in pretty good shape. Can you say the same about the American dollar?
Answer: These differences can be noted for the most part in people's behavior and attitudes. The major difference between eastern and western culture is that people in the east are more conservative and traditional than the general population in the west. Life in the west was different from the life in the east because of people's culture,behavior and actions.
Explanation:
The difference between the westerners and the people living in the east is mainly the social, cultural and behavioral attitude. Westerners feel less complicated about the life and its rules. While the people living in the east is most concerned about the religious practices, culture and norms. They actually are more conservative and traditional while the people in west are super cool and easy. People in east are more preferred to actions and gestures, while westerners speak out frank what they really have in their mind.
Explanation: Hope this helps
Answer:
In late 19th century/early 20th century, the United States had become a global power with interests - and investments - around the globe. It was a new status and it had was symbolized by the victory in the Spanish-American War. The US was strong, modern and industrialized and it could support a powerful army and the powerful navy advocated by naval strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan. The "big stick diplomacy" meant that the US could impose its preferred outcomes abroad by military force if it wanted to. It translated into military interventions in the Caribbean to bring order in troubled nations and prevent European intervention, anathema to the Monroe Doctrine.
Explanation:
