<span>For example, you are trying to study the effects of depression in women and men.
Suppose you used a scale for depression in a form of test. There are a lot of raw scores given since your participants are over a hundred. You can use a frequency table to cluster and categorize the parameters which are the raw scores in a more tabled setting for example
Raw scores f
1-5 1
6-10 5
11-15 9
16-20 55
Statistics. </span><span>Statistics is a branch of mathematics which is the scientific study of mathematical values pertaining to qualitative descriptions and transcribe them into quantifying values such as the descriptive statistics and infuses these quantities in the field of inferential statistics. In these two categories involve probabilities, distribution and deviations which are mainly compositions of the descriptive statistics. Inferential statistics will involve comparison and variation of the given values. Methods are t-test, analysis of variance, and two-way analysis of variance and other methods.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
15.74% of women are between 65.5 inches and 68.5 inches.
Step-by-step explanation:
Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean
and standard deviation
, the zscore of a measure X is given by:

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
In this problem, we have that:

What percentage of women are between 65.5 inches and 68.5 inches?
This percentage is the pvalue of Z when X = 68.5 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 65.5.
X = 68.5



has a pvalue of 0.9987
X = 65.5



has a pvalue of 0.8413
So 0.9987 - 0.8413 = 0.1574 = 15.74% of women are between 65.5 inches and 68.5 inches.
Answer:
slope / m = 3/2 & y-intercept = (0,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
y=mx+b is the formula
m in this equation is 3/2 (y=3/2x)
there's no b because there's no constant so it's (0,0)
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The simple interest is calculated only on the principal amount of a loan so it is relatively easier to calculate than the compound interest.
The compound interest is calculated on the principle amount plus the interest that the amount gets per compounding period up to the period of the loan. In other words, in compound interest we get, interest on interest.
This difference between the both, is the reason, we get more money in compound interest than simple one.
Let us take an example-
Suppose the principle is = $5000
r = 5% or 0.05
t = 5 years
Simple interest formula is :

=> 
So, total amount after 5 years will become =
dollars.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lets check for compound interest where the interest is compounded annually.
p = $5000
r = 5% or 0.05
t = 5 years
n = 1
Compound interest formula is :


=>
A = $6381.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We can see that we are getting more money in compound interest than the simple interest, for the same amount and same time period.
<span><u><em>The correct answer is: </em></u>
dilation and rotation.
<u><em>Explanation</em></u><span><u><em>: </em></u>
Rotations, reflections and translations are known as rigid transformations; this means they do not change the size or shape of a figure, they simply move it. These rigid transformations preserve congruence.
Dilation, however, are not rigid transformations, since they change the size of a shape. Dilation would not change the shape, just the size; the angle measures would be the same, and the ratio of corresponding sides would be equal to the scale factor used in the dilation. This would give us a similar, but not congruent, figure.</span></span>