Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
Answer:
10.52 years
Explanation:
We can work out the number of years using this relationship
V =P× (1+r)^n
V= tribe valeu = 3×3.5 = 10.5
r-growth rate -11%
n- number of years- ?
10.5 = 3.5× (1.11)^n
<em>dividing both sides by 1.11^n</em>
1.11^n = 10.5/3.5
<em>taking the log of both sides</em>
n log 1.11 = log 3
n = log 3/log 1.11
n =10.52
Answer:
Rp = 3% + BP1 * 10.42% + BP2 * 6.1%
Explanation:
Portfolio A:
R_p = R_f + Beta1*Factor1 + Beta2*Factor2
32% = 3% + 1.6*F1 + 2*F2
Portfolio B
29% = 3% + 2.6*F1 - 0.2*F2
Solvig the equatios
3% = -F1 + 2.2*F2
F1 = 2.2F2 - 3%
F1 = 2.2F2 - 0.03
Substituting
29% = 3% + 2.6*(2.2F2 - 0.03) - 0.2F2
29% = 3% + 5.72F2 - 0.078 - 0.2F2
5.52F2 = 29% - 3% +0.078
5.52F2 = 0.26 +0.078
5.52F2= 0.338
F2 = 0.338/5.52 = 0.061
F1 = 2.2F2 - 0.03 = 2.2(0.061) - 0.03
= 0.1042
The return Beta relationship in this economy Rp = 3% + BP1 * 10.42% + BP2 * 6.1%
Answer:
lower
Explanation:
A natural monopoly appears when there are high entry costs like large infrastructure costs or economies of scale where a company can provide the products at a lower costs than others which provides a big advantage to the firm in the market and makes it difficult for any potential competitor to be able to compete. According to that, the answer is that a natural monopoly exists when a single seller experiences lower average total costs than any potential competitor as this represents a barrier for the competitor to be able to enter the market.