1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
3 years ago
5

After the end of the Civil War in 1865, American would not experience an international war until

History
1 answer:
andre [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Until Spanish-American war that was fought in 1898.

Explanation:

After Civil War United States started rearranging their internal, but also external policy. At the end of 19th Century United States started spreading their power outside their country. During that period in 1898 a war was waged against Spain. Known as the Spanish-American war it was fought around Cuba and Philippines. United States remained a world power.

You might be interested in
President Lyndon Johnson began his career as a at a small in Cotulla (near ). At the , he worked with young Mexican American stu
Volgvan

Answer:

<h3>It helped him understand the need of education.</h3>

Explanation:

  • When President Lyndon B Johnson began his career as a teacher at a small school in Cotulla, Texas, he saw that many of his student struggled attaining schools because of poverty and lack of opportunity.
  • The experience inspired him to develop and implement educational policies when he became the president. As he understood the need of education, he emphasized on providing education to all young people in the country.
  • President Lyndon implemented the Elementary and Secondary Education Act on April 11, 1965 and started campaigns like Project Head Start. He always believed that education was the ticket to opportunity and development for every individual in the country.
7 0
3 years ago
What two nations have been directly involved with the three major Arab-Israeli wars?
Alchen [17]
In the Six-Day War (1967) the countries were: Israel, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq.

In the War of Attrition (1967-1970) countries were: Israel, Egypt, Soviet Union, PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization), and Jordan.

In the Yom Kippur War (1973) countries were: Israel, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Algeria, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and Cuba.

So it would be Israel and Egypt. Sorry for that. I forgot it said 'what TWO'.


7 0
3 years ago
Many other Americans have followed Carnegie’s lead and done the same thing, for example
Pie

Answer:

As discussed previously, new processes in steel refining, along with inventions in the fields of communications and electricity, transformed the business landscape of the nineteenth century. The exploitation of these new technologies provided opportunities for tremendous growth, and business entrepreneurs with financial backing and the right mix of business acumen and ambition could make their fortunes. Some of these new millionaires were known in their day as robber barons, a negative term that connoted the belief that they exploited workers and bent laws to succeed. Regardless of how they were perceived, these businessmen and the companies they created revolutionized American industry.

RAILROADS AND ROBBER BARONS

Earlier in the nineteenth century, the first transcontinental railroad and subsequent spur lines paved the way for rapid and explosive railway growth, as well as stimulated growth in the iron, wood, coal, and other related industries. The railroad industry quickly became the nation’s first “big business.” A powerful, inexpensive, and consistent form of transportation, railroads accelerated the development of virtually every other industry in the country. By 1890, railroad lines covered nearly every corner of the United States, bringing raw materials to industrial factories and finished goods to consumer markets. The amount of track grew from 35,000 miles at the end of the Civil War to over 200,000 miles by the close of the century. Inventions such as car couplers, air brakes, and Pullman passenger cars allowed the volume of both freight and people to increase steadily. From 1877 to 1890, both the amount of goods and the number of passengers traveling the rails tripled.

Financing for all of this growth came through a combination of private capital and government loans and grants. Federal and state loans of cash and land grants totaled $150 million and 185 million acres of public land, respectively. Railroads also listed their stocks and bonds on the New York Stock Exchange to attract investors from both within the United States and Europe. Individual investors consolidated their power as railroads merged and companies grew in size and power. These individuals became some of the wealthiest Americans the country had ever known. Midwest farmers, angry at large railroad owners for their exploitative business practices, came to refer to them as “robber barons,” as their business dealings were frequently shady and exploitative. Among their highly questionable tactics was the practice of differential shipping rates, in which larger business enterprises received discounted rates to transport their goods, as opposed to local producers and farmers whose higher rates essentially subsidized the discounts.

Jay Gould was perhaps the first prominent railroad magnate to be tarred with the “robber baron” brush. He bought older, smaller, rundown railroads, offered minimal improvements, and then capitalized on factory owners’ desires to ship their goods on this increasingly popular and more cost-efficient form of transportation. His work with the Erie Railroad was notorious among other investors, as he drove the company to near ruin in a failed attempt to attract foreign investors during a takeover attempt. His model worked better in the American West, where the railroads were still widely scattered across the country, forcing farmers and businesses to pay whatever prices Gould demanded in order to use his trains. In addition to owning the Union Pacific Railroad that helped to construct the original transcontinental railroad line, Gould came to control over ten thousand miles of track across the United States, accounting for 15 percent of all railroad transportation. When he died in 1892, Gould had a personal worth of over $100 million, although he was a deeply unpopular figure.

In contrast to Gould’s exploitative business model, which focused on financial profit more than on tangible industrial contributions, Commodore Cornelius Vanderbilt was a “robber baron” who truly cared about the success of his railroad enterprise and its positive impact on the American economy. Vanderbilt consolidated several smaller railroad lines, called trunk lines, to create the powerful New York Central Railroad Company, one of the largest corporations in the United States at the time. He later purchased stock in the major rail lines that would connect his company to Chicago, thus expanding his reach and power while simultaneously creating a railroad network to connect Chicago to New York City. This consolidation provided more efficient connections from Midwestern suppliers to eastern markets. It was through such consolidation that, by 1900, seven major railroad tycoons controlled over 70 percent of all operating lines. Vanderbilt’s personal wealth at his death (over $100 million in 1877), placed him among the top three wealthiest individuals in American history.

6 0
3 years ago
which statement best describes the consequences of european plantation owners brutal treatment of their african slaves in the am
mylen [45]

The answer is d: huge numbers of Africans died within a few years of arriving in the Americas. Many Africans who were captured were put in cramped conditions where many of them did not survive the trip.  Those who did were sold and were made to work on plantations.  Some slaves where whipped if they angered their masters while others died either from over worked or cruelty.


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might peasants be interested in fighting in The Crusades?
Anna35 [415]
One reason why peasants might have been interested in fighting in The Crusades is because this would have enriched the crusading country--which would have led to an increase in their standard of living (to a certain extent). 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Northerners mostly agreed that:
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about Europen efforts to trade in the East is not true
    15·1 answer
  • What was the significance of Angle and Ellis island
    12·1 answer
  • In the European feudal system under manorialism,
    5·1 answer
  • as the united states industrialized, many americans concluded that the nation needed new overseas markets to
    13·1 answer
  • During Jackson's term in office he: refused to use Federal troops to protect the Cherokee tribe appealed to the Supreme Court fo
    7·2 answers
  • What will eternity be like for the unsaved?
    11·1 answer
  • Identify whether these Amendments to the U.S. Constitution changed the structure of the Federal government, altered the personal
    11·1 answer
  • Hey, can someone please help me out with this?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAPP!! The most important outcome of the Treaty of 1818 was that Britain claimed land west of the Mississippi. O the US-Ca
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!