1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kvasek [131]
2 years ago
5

What are the names of the 7major UK parties who were campaigning to win the election

Law
1 answer:
sertanlavr [38]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Leader Party Leader's Seat Number of Seats Leader since

1.)Boris Johnson Conservative Party Uxbridge and South Ruislip 365, 23 July 2019

2.)Keir Starmer Labour Party Holborn and St Pancras 202, 4 April 2020

3.)Ian Blackford[a] Scottish National Party Ross, Skye, and Lochaber 47,14 June 2017

4.)Ed Davey [b] Liberal Democrats Kingston and Surbiton 11,27 August 2020

5.)Jeffrey Donaldson Democratic Unionist Party Lagan Valley 8 17 December 2019

6.)Liz Saville Roberts Plaid Cymru Dwyfor Meirionnydd 3, 14 June 2017

7.)Caroline Lucas Green Party of England 0

You might be interested in
I’m sooooooooooooooooooooo confused
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Public morals

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the course of stealing and destroying evidence, Monika committed several other crimes—mugging a police officer, setting fire
wolverine [178]

Answer:

I would lock her up that way she can’t harm anyone and she’s not a risk of public safety or put her on probation and maybe some therapy of some sort

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
DUE TODAY!!! PLEASE HELP!!!
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor encouraged her staff to enjoy whitewater rafting, Mexican take-out brunch and tours of the Smithsonian. Justice Stephen Breyer loves to read French manuscripts and cultivated his distaste for footnotes during his clerkship to Arthur Goldberg. Such details were plentiful as Professor John Feerick introduced Justice O'Connor and her former colleague Justice Breyer to a well-heeled audience of lawyers and law students at Fordham Law School yesterday morning.

The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.

Sally Rider, Director of the William Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona, kicked things off with a series of questions. Why, she asked O'Connor, did she decide to convene this conference on judicial independence in the first place?

O'Connor said she remembered seeing  "Impeach Earl Warren" signs in New Mexico and Arizona when she was growing up, and said that in her final years on the Supreme Court, attacks on judges increased, including proposals for mass impeachments of judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case, or proposals to cut judicial terms short, or a particularly disconcerting movement towards "Jail4Judges," a campaign to allow citizen panels to review rulings from the bench, with the ability to even imprison—as the name tantalizingly implies—those who made bad decisions. These developments were "very depressing," she said, and so she decided to use her retirement to call attention to these attacks on judges.

"An independent judiciary is an essential bedrock principle, and we're losing it."  The reason was in part the fact that civics and government are not a requirement for high school graduation. "One third of Americans can't name the three branches of government, but two thirds can name a judge on American Idol!"

Money has been pouring in to state judicial elections in recent years, including races for State Supreme Court justices. A 2004 campaign for a seat on the Illinois Supreme Court brought in a record-setting $9.3 million in political contributions, including hundreds of thousands of dollars from State Farm, a company with a case pending before the court. And just recently,  Wisconsin voters were subjected to over 11,000 televised campaign ads in the weeks before their state's Supreme Court race, over ninety percent of which were purchased by special interest groups (racking up a bill of well over 3.6 million dollars). Said O'Connor, "We put cash in the courtrooms, and it's just wrong." She then pointed to the room of lawyers and students. "You should take this seriously." (A later panel backed up O'Connor's concerns. New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak, Brennan Center attorney James Sample and Professor Michael Dimino discussed evidence that judges tend to rule in favor of their campaign contributors.)

She went on. "No other nation in the world elects judges." She pointed to Georgina Woods, the chief justice of Ghana, sitting in the front row, as if to illustrate her point.

"Why are we tolerating this? What are we going to do about it?" Then, seeming to remember that the initial question posed to her several minutes before was "why did you convene this conference," she added, "That's why," and sat back in her chair. The audience laughed and applauded.

Breyer took the floor next. Keeping state courts impartial is a major issue, but try talking about it with people "and they're asleep after five minutes." He recounted a trip to Russia he had made when serving as an appellate judge for the First Circuit after he was appointed by Carter. Meeting with Russian judges from across the country, he was surprised to hear their accounts of "telephone justice," when the party boss calls and tells judges which way to vote. "They asked me, ‘do you have telephone justice in the United States,' and I had to explain to them that no, the President wouldn't call you. He'd be crazy to do that."

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Raudhah plan to set up an E-Games centre where she provides service for customer to play PlayStation 5 at the game centre. She e
ivanzaharov [21]

The problem, in this case, was that Raudhah established a contract with Adam before he knew if the loan application would be approved.

<h3>What should be done in this case?</h3>
  • Raudhah should have made the contract with Adam after the loan application was approved.
  • Raudhah cannot keep Adam's products without paying for them.
  • The contract between Raudhah and Adam must be in writing and accurately determine the payment date.

Raudhah bought Adam's products not sure if he could afford them. This became an issue as Raudhah's funding was not approved.

Adam should have reviewed the contract and not agreed to deliver the goods without assurance of payment.

More information about contracts is in the link:

brainly.com/question/14315509

8 0
2 years ago
The monthly failure-to-pay on time penalty is usually
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

Failure-to-pay penalty is charged for failing to pay your tax by the due date. The late payment penalty is 0.5% of the tax owed after the due date, for each month or part of a month the tax remains unpaid, up to 25%. You won't have to pay the penalty if you can show reasonable cause for the failure to pay on time.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
    11·1 answer
  • Which mineral listed in the Mohs scale is harder than quartz and softer than a diamond?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the depreciable period, in terms of the QBI deduction, for a vehicle?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about criminal cases?
    12·1 answer
  • The most famous case involving ___________________ is ProCD Inc. v. Zeidenberg (1996). ProCD sold a software product that was a
    7·1 answer
  • Pleaseee drop xbox gamertags for an inv to a party rn !!
    14·2 answers
  • If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000
    13·2 answers
  • Who is NOT typically found in the courtroom?
    13·1 answer
  • The basis of conflict theory is capitalism and our society’s obsession with material well-being. The theory argues that those in
    12·1 answer
  • Be sure to answer at least one, or both, of the questions below in your response to the prompt. Explain your reasoning so that y
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!