Answer:
The constitutionality of the Act was challenged by states based on two main grounds: 1. The issue of individual mandate; and 2. Mandatory expansion of medicaid by states.
Explanation:
The Affordable Healthcare Act otherwise known as Obamacare was a health reform Act that came into force in 2010 under the Obama administration in the United States of America which made provision for affordable health insurance for every citizen of America, and also expanded the scope of eligibility for medicaid in the United States of America. The constitutionality/legality of the Act was challenged by a total of about 26 states of the United States of America particularly on the ground that the Act imposed sanctions on states which failed to expand the medicaid, and on the ground of individual mandate to purchase health insurance violated the original Clause.
However, concerning the issue of individual mandate to buy health insurance, the Supreme Court of America upheld the constitutionality of the ACA on the ground that the congress has the valid and constitutional power to impose tax.
On the other hand, on the issue of mandatory expansion of medicaid by states, the court stated that it was optional and not mandatory for states to chose to expand the medicaid, thereby declaring the mandatory medicaid expansion by states unconstitutional.
Here is what i wrote for my essay:
World War I was settled by the victors at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The “Big Four,” who made all the major decisions, were President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain, George Clemenceau of France, and of least importance, Italian Prime Minister Vittorio Orlando. Each major power had its own agenda coming to the Conference and not every aim was represented in the final treaties.
Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George all had different points of view at the Paris Peace Conference. For instance, lloyd George of Britain wanted to build a postwar Britain "fit for heroes". British aims at the conference were focused on securing France, settling territorial disputes, and maintaining their colonial holdings. Clemenceau of France wanted to weaken Germany so it could never threaten France. Having witnessed two German attacks on French soil in the last 40 years, France’s main concern was to ensure Germany would not be able to attack them again, so they pushed to weaken Germany militarily, strategically, and economically. Wilson of the U.S. wanted "peace without victory" with his fourteen points. The Americans’ vision was set out in Wilson’s Fourteen Points, which emphasized free trade, self-determination, and the founding of a League of Nations to support territorial and political independence of member nations.
PLEASE LIKE AND RATE MY ANSWER
Here's your correct matching arrangements:
1. This form of imperial rule involved claiming exclusive trading rights in certain areas. Trading rights must be granted under the threat of military force. In the 19th century, this type of imperial rule was used by countries such as Great Britain, France, Portugal, Russia, and Japan in China.
2. Local rulers such as kings or sultans were used to govern the colonies in order to lessen the possibility of a revolt. Great Britain practiced this type of imperialism.
3. A form of imperial rule in which local rulers were left in place, however, they were expected to follow the advice of imperial advisers on issues such as trade and missionary activity. In this form of imperial rule, the countries are still independent, however, they are under the protection of an imperial country.
4. Officials and soldiers from the imperial country were sent to control the colony. This type of imperial rule was practiced by the French.
Answer:
a) feeble-minded
Explanation:
The IQ tests which fully mean INTELLIGENT QUOTIENT were used to screen FEEBLE-MINDED from entry to the United States for the sole aim of keeping away those people that are mentally deficient out of the country reason been that a person or an individual who is FEEBLE-MINDED has low IQ ,they are intellectually weak, they cannot make decisions that are intelligent because they don't have the IQ to think in an intelligent way.
