Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
"Polarization is a property applying to transverse waves that specifies the geometrical orientation of the oscillations."
"Patronage is the support, encouragement, privilege, or financial aid that an organization or individual bestows to another."
"A one-party system is a form of government where the country is ruled by a single political party, meaning only one political party exists and the forming of other political parties is forbidden."
"A plurality vote or relative majority describes the circumstance when a candidate or proposition polls more votes than any other but does not receive more than half of all votes cast. "
"In the United States, direct primary care is a type of primary care billing and payment arrangement made between patients and medical providers, without sending claims to insurance providers."
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
The National Labor Relations Board a. enforces antitrust laws against unions enforces workers' rights to unionize.-d.
One should avoid bad deeds because it is ethically and morally wrong. In a religious perspective it is wrong, for example, to put on a blood transfusion. Based on the article (Accept or Refuse Blood Transfusion) states: Professor Gerhard von Rad has pointed out that Genesis 9:3, 4 “is not an isolated ‘dietary law’ at all . . . but an ordinance for all mankind.” (Genesis—A Commentary, 1961) Remember, too, that in Genesis 9:3-6 the prohibition on blood was linked with God’s statement about man’s having even higher regard for the life of other humans. Rabbi Benno Jacob observed:
“The two prohibitions belong together. . . . The permission to eat meat, but without its blood, and the prohibition against shedding human blood indicate the place of man within the world of the living . . . In summary: the reason for the prohibition of blood is of a moral character. . . . Later Judaism regarded this passage as establishing fundamental ethics for every human being.”
And, In society, it is wrong for a minor to be with a person who is older than themselves, steal, or cheat on a spouse. We avoid bad deeds in order to have a clean conscious, to oblige with society rules, to be ok with others, to not disobey the norms of a law, etc. In conclusion, there are many reason to avoid bad deeds. Be it personal, because of society or religious.
