Answer:
12%
Explanation:
The discount rate will be PV/FV -1
i.e., i = (Fv/pv )-1
i= (280/250) - 1
i = 1.12-1
i=12%
Answer:
C. Father and his 35-year-old son investing in separate account.
Explanation:
Quantity discount when offered relates to one particular account, and not multiple accounts at a time.
In a transaction joint accounts are called as single person where there is only one main account in consideration and no secondary account exists for the same.
As in the given options,
Option A of husband and wife investing in a joint account means a single account is made of which both the husband and wife are controllers.
Option B is of UTMA account which is made for the benefit of the minor child, although involves two people that is parent and child, but is run individually by the parent and is a single account.
Further Option C provides for separate investment accounts , which means two different accounts and therefore are completely different one of father and another of son, thus do not qualify of quantity discount jointly, either of the one account can claim the quantity discount as a person.
Answer:
C. <u>not valid because performance depends on Parsley's personal skills</u>
Explanation:
A valid contract refers to an agreement entered into by parties which legally binds both parties and is enforceable under the law.
For a contract to be termed as valid, it must be performed by the parties to it.
Performance clause in a valid contract refers to doing or acting in a way as is required by the terms of the contract.
In the given case, Parsley signed a contract to provide services i.e provide French cooking lessons to Curry. Later, Parsley wants to transfer his duties to Relish.
The transfer will not be valid since the performance i.e service to be provided by Parsley are of personal nature and the consideration is based upon that. No two individuals can provide exact services.
Answer:
Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :
a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.
b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.
c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.
The internal growth rate of a firm is best described as the: A. minimum growth rate achievable assuming a 100 percent retention ratio. B. minimum. The tax rate and the dividend payout ratio will be held constant. Current and. The Two Sisters has a 9 percent return on assets and a 75 percent retention ratio.
hope this helps.
