The phrase is “Quantum Meruit”.
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
Answer:
Under the Articles of Confederation the states had significant amounts of power while the central government had very little power.
Explanation:
The articles of confederation initially created by the founding fathers to make sure that the central government cannot violate the right of the citizens through tyrannical action.
This is the reason why they designed it so the central government had very little power over the states.
But, several problems occurred because of this system of government. For example, It is became really hard for the central government to collect taxes from the states. The earliest form of the articles of the Confederation didn't provide the central government with the power to overrule states' authority in case they make violations like not paying taxes.
A patriarchal society is a society where the power is in the hands of men, and is not distributed between men and women and it's not in the hands of the men.
So the answer is that in classical China all the political, social and economic power was in the hands of men. <span>
</span>
