Answer:
d. refers to how a firm does something unique to create added value.
Explanation:
The competitive advantage is the advantage that is gained by the company over its competitors. It can be gained through various things like - reasonable product, best quality, and quantity, great services through which the customers of competitors could be the shift to the company.
The motive of this is to create some value added to the company products by considering the innovative ideas to attract the customers and maximize customer satisfaction that results to accomplish the company goals and objectives.
Answer:
$92,400
Explanation:
Coolwear incorporation has a balance in its prepaid insurance account of $48,400
In 2018, $86,000 was paid for insurance
At the end of 2018, the balance was $42,000 after adjusting entries were recorded
Therefore the insurance expense for 2018 can be calculated as follows
= $48,400 + $86,000-$42,000
= $134,400-$42,000
= $92,400
Hence the insurance expense for 2018 is $92,400
Answer: there will be too much pollution
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution and that the optimal tax should have been $1,500 but government officials have set the tax equal to $500.
It should be noted that due to the fact that the optimal tax has been set below the equilibrium, this will lead to a rise in pollution as the people will be aware that they're paying less than the optimal level which will lead to more pollution. An increase in the optimal tax will have help in reducing the pollution.
Answer:
€2,500 million
Explanation:
Data provided as per the requirement of estimated benefit to the population is here below:-
Benefit of the tariff reduction = €5
Size of population = €500 million
The computation of estimated benefit to the population is shown below:-
Estimated benefit to the population = Benefit from tariff reduction × Size of population
= €5 × €500 million
= €2,500 million
Therefore for computing the estimated benefit to the population we simply applied the above formula.
Answer: No it is not.
Explanation:
Uber by first establishing itself and then fighting regulators leaves itself open to attack around the world. This is because the Regulators have the power to keep adjusting the laws that govern Uber if they feel that Uber has an unfair advantage or if it's existence is detrimental to the society. Uber has been accused many times of various infractions such as Tax Evasions and being a conduit through which crime can be committed because it did not conduct proper background checks.
Going back to the issue of taxes, if the regulators feel that Uber may be avoiding taxes, they could impose laws that either cause an increase in Uber prices or remove them from a location which can have a native influence on Uber's bottomline.
This approach is not good because regulators do not like being fought and will try to ascert dominance. It is simply not viable and this has been proven with Uber's many suspensions around the world.
