1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KiRa [710]
3 years ago
14

Did the printing press preserve the past or invent the future?

History
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
4 0
The printing press invented the future, it was the inspiration for devices like the type writer and the key board. Plus the printing press is the reason the production of the bible had a mass spike in production, thus also shaping the future.
I hope this helps.
You might be interested in
HELPP!!!
nlexa [21]

Answer:

I believe it is because a lot of americans live by the moral belief that people should become successful all on their own without any help. We are also considerable debt, we simply do not have the resources or funding for the amount of education that is currently accessible at this time, moving forward it will only get increasingly more expensive. It would be easier to restrict people who can not afford to pay for the materials necessary for education instead of providing them with the materials they need regardless if you have money. I disagree with these reasons because America was founded on the ideals that every person was created equal, regardless if history has stuck to this idea. Giving everyone access to education would guarantee that every soul in this nation has the same opportunity as others.

Explanation:

sorry the paragraph is kinda thic my b.

8 0
3 years ago
The part of the brain that allows us to see, smell, hear, taste, and feel is the _____.
Alex777 [14]
Answer: Cerebrum. explanation: the cerebrum enables functions like vision, hearing, and other senses.
3 0
1 year ago
Who is correct in this conflict between israel and palestinian arabs
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

The Palestinian arabs.

Explanation:

This is not a conflict. This is Israeli-apartheid to ethnically cleanse Palestinians. They are being forcibly displaced from their homes. The Occupied Palestinian Territories are primarily governed by international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Israel's policy of settling its civilians in occupied Palestinian territory and displacing the local population <u>violates international law. </u>

Israel's appropriation of Palestinian land and natural resources for purposed other than security needs or the benefit of the local Palestinian population amounts to 'pillage,' which is illegal under the Hague Regulations and Fourth Geneva Convention and is a war crime under the Rome Statue of the international Criminal Court.

Transferring the occupying power's civilians into the occupied territory is prohibited without exception.

Israel authorities and soldiers unlawfully kill, arrest, and injure many Palestinian civilians, including during protests against the confiscation of land. Palestinians are routinely subjected to arbitrary detention.

Israel has committed crimes recognised by international organizations. Recently, an Israel sniper murdered a journalist for the Al Jazeera News Organization, which is yet, another international law violation, another war crime!

7 0
2 years ago
Review the four freedoms that Roosevelt describes at the end of the provided excerpt. In a two-paragraph response, compare these
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

Freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear, these are the four freedoms the president Roosevelt outlines in his speech after pearl harbor. In the speech he talks about where the country is going and what we as a people have to do. The bill of rights has a similar propose, defining the values of a new country and the responsibilities we have in upholding them. They also have many of the same ideals being shown.

Now many of the articles are not comparable such as Article the tenth “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” but some work very well. The sentiment in article eleven and five for example really reminds me of freedom of fear. We have troops protecting us and we don't need to be scared of our rights being taken away because we are guaranteed them in the constitution. Freedom of speech and freedom of worship with the third article is the most obvious pairing. The one I am having the hardest time with is freedom from want. What does that even mean and why is it important enough to be mixed in with free speech but if it is so important then why is there no good parallel in the bill of rights. This one is specific to the four freedoms because it's more of an ask than a gift. Be free of your wants and consumerism and give some things up for the greater good of america. There isn't an ask for a favor in the bill of rights but right then after pearl harbor the country needed to be reminded of what they have been given by their country and now what they need to give back.    

1. Freedom of speech 2. Freedom of worship 3. Freedom from want 4. Freedom from fear The first amendment covers the first two as has been stated. "Freedom from want? Really? I can't always get what I want at the store and I am willing to pay for it. This is not a "freedom"; you have the freedom to buy or make what you want but you don't have any freedon to just have what you want. Even in socialist countries they don't have it. In socialism your only freedom is to do as you are told by the one in power. You don't have any rights. Freedom from fear? There is no way anyone can be free of fear, and certainly no way any government can provide that to individuals. Here is the Bill of Rights, Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion and Petition Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and topetition the Government for a redress of grievances. Right to keep and bear arms A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Conditions for quarters of soldiers No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time ofwar, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

7 0
2 years ago
What agreement did the Sioux accept in return for peace under the fort laramie treaty of 1868?
yKpoI14uk [10]
The Sioux agreed to settle within a reservation in Black Hills of the Dakota territory in exchange for peace.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the 2nd Great awakening?
    6·1 answer
  • Which author received the Pulitzer Prize in 1998?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the north ordinance of the 1787 reflect Thomas Jefferson’s ideas
    7·1 answer
  • Please help!!
    9·2 answers
  • The Visigoths invaded which European country?
    7·1 answer
  • This civilization invented the sickle.
    15·2 answers
  • What are two ways the meaning of the U.S Constitution can change
    13·1 answer
  • What colony had many German immigrants?
    13·1 answer
  • If I have a pen and a pineapple what did I make? (very hard question lol)
    8·1 answer
  • It was during the First World War that a silent pilgrimage took its
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!