Answer:
21 With glasses
Step-by-step explanation:
32/20=1.6
1.6•7=11.2 Without Glasses
1.6•13=20.8 With Glasses
20.8 rounded to nearest whole number=21
9514 1404 393
Answer:
21
Step-by-step explanation:
Rearranging the given ratio, we can find the ratio of boys to the total.
boys : (boys +girls) = 7 : (7+8) = 7 : 15
Then the number of boys is ...
(7/15)(45) = 21
There are 21 boys in the classroom.
look at the equation see if that the right answer if it wrong u start by over again or go on Google to find it
Based on my experiences so far, the approach to geometry that I prefer is: Euclidean Geometry. This is because the problems are easy to visualize since they are restricted to two-dimensional planes.
<h3>Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions?</h3>
The approach that is easier to extend beyond two dimensions is Euclidean Geometry. Again, this is because of how it deals with shapes and visualization of the same.
Take for instance a triangle; it is easy to go from a two-dimensional equilateral triangle to a square pyramid.
<h3> What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other?</h3>
Analytical geometry is a superior technique for discovering objects (points, curves, and planes) based on their qualities in some situations than Euclidean geometry is in others (for example, when employing topography or building charts).
Learn more about Euclidean Geometry at;
brainly.com/question/2251564
#SPJ1
38 samples per hour is your answer
