1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ne4ueva [31]
3 years ago
11

Dog goes "woof"

Law
2 answers:
aliina [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Ring-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding

Gering-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding

Gering-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding

Explanation: I am the fox!!! Also, I know the whole song too! :)

V125BC [204]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: it’s weird noise

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What position was Marshall appointed to by President Eisenhower years after this case?
Kipish [7]

Answer:

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

please mark this answer as brainliest

4 0
2 years ago
criminal law recognizes that a defendant may not be responsible for a criminal act if his mental state was impaired by
irina1246 [14]
Bipolar depression disorder I believe
4 0
2 years ago
4. What is one downside of federalism?
____ [38]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

It allows laws to be inconsistent from state to state.

4 0
2 years ago
Which legal school of thought is illustrated in this dialogue? DONUT DAY AT THE OFFICE Part 7 Alison: (She stands during David's
andrezito [222]

Answer:

The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:

Law and economics school of thought.

Explanation:

The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws.  This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices.  This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.

3 0
3 years ago
What protects a person's liberty to speak without government restraint?
maria [59]
A, freedom of speech because it’s the first amendment right for people to be able to speak without opposition or penalty
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act? Select one: a. Implements the principle that a signature, contract, or other record may not
    8·1 answer
  • According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
    9·1 answer
  • Shared left turn lanes are common on 2 lane county road true or false
    10·2 answers
  • 5. Because police communicate with so many types of people in such a wide variety
    12·2 answers
  • Who does an agent represent during the solicitation of insurance
    14·1 answer
  • Mea 9884 gpiusysvme its a word scramble
    8·1 answer
  • What is one role of Congress in determining the federal budget?
    15·1 answer
  • The American criminal trial system is based on the notion that a person is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Do you t
    5·1 answer
  • What five amendments deal with the presidency and presidential elections?​
    8·1 answer
  • What basis for loan discharge can be used against ashford university for borrower defense
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!