1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NikAS [45]
2 years ago
15

What should a security officer do if an incident does occur?

Law
1 answer:
kaheart [24]2 years ago
4 0
I would say all the above. But I could be wrong. I’m sure security guards have to handle a situation in the right manner; in which all these steps are.

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
Chris is the owner of a fast food stall. Dan bought some food from Chris' stall. Dan became
luda_lava [24]

it would be against chris because he cooked the food (is the owner aswell) because dan did't know that the food was contaminated.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
I love this site! Does anyone else?
Mrac [35]

Answer:

it is ight.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The constitution reflects the principle separation of powers because it
iragen [17]

Answer:

Provides a system of checks and balances between the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches, where the powers of each branch are limited by the others.

Explanation:

The constitution frames the ideal of separation of powers as crucial for limiting any hegemonic power that might prevail. During the debates that framed the US constitution, James Madison argued that sectoral interests should be protected against the coercion of any majority, which led to the drafting of a constitution that protected individual liberties from the coercion of the majority. Thus the constitution states that the executive branch, who can appoint judges and veto laws,  should  be limited by the legislative branch, in charge of enacting laws, and the judicial branch, in charge of interpreting and applying the law.

7 0
3 years ago
Your local police department is concerned with this year's most recent crime statistics. The police chief meets with city offici
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer: it would be: a. closed

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which level of government should have control over American policies on drugs? What problems might arise with level you chose?
    7·1 answer
  • 1.Each state has its own constitution, separate from the United States Constitution. What do you think States would include in t
    5·1 answer
  • 12. What does this sign mean? A. Slow down, be ready to stop if needed to let cross traffic pass before you proceed. B. Stop and
    8·2 answers
  • 4 One of your favorite television shows is about law enforcement. The characters spend a lot of time working in the crime lab wh
    6·2 answers
  • The type of government we have in the United State. A government
    5·2 answers
  • The husband says: “I know what I’m doing. Its not my first time.” Why is his arugment a generalization?
    8·1 answer
  • Read the example in the reference image. This is an example of the government doing what?
    15·1 answer
  • Discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the reparations Germany paid at the end of World War I. Why do you think the
    7·1 answer
  • What core value is common to all U.S. Military services? *
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT typically significant information that should be included in a residential listing agreement?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!