Answer:
Option C - Resources. Please let me know if it's correct or not
Somos prejuiciosos todos y es por culpa del mundo en que vivimos.
Somos así porque la vida diaria nos ha entrenado para obrar así, vivimos llenos de miedo y con nuestros mecanismos de defensa activados 24 horas al día incluyendo los domingos cuando estamos solos en nuestra cama desconfiando de una película porque no nos gusta su carátula. Somos así porque los medios, la sociedad y las generaciones anteriores nos enseñaron a escandalizarnos al ver a una pareja de novios de distinto color de piel.
Answer:
B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.
Explanation:
In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .
Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
