I would say it's A, because like the question stated, his curiosity, tends to overcome his judgement. But the thing about this is that this leads into C, because his curiosity comes before his judgement, so he is risking his life, to be curious...
Hope this helped!! :)
What the heck do you mean
The correct option is C. Going to college shows that Mr. J.P. is smart and that he works harder than Fanny’s brothers do.
In the excerpt, the narrator says that Mr. J.P. has proved to be superior at University which means that he has gone to college. Moreover, the narrator also states that he is a scholar and that Fanny's "idle" brothers would "ill bear a comparison" with him. The narrator implies that Fanny's brothers are lazy because of the word "idle" used to described them. Moreover, by saying "ill bear a comparison", the narrator implies that if you compare Fanny's brothers and Mr. J.P., Mr. J.P. would definitely have more positive traits and characteristics than Fanny's brothers.
Answer:
A part to whole analogy that compares two types of transportation is ''wheel is to car as motor is to boat". The way to rewrite the analogy so that it shows a whole to part relationship. is "car is to wheel as boat is to motor".
Explanation:
