In this case, teachers first should Reword the question, using proper terminology So other students that hear this do not stay away from the main context of the question.
After that, the teachers should answer the question if developmentally appropriate. (they have to consider whether the student is old enough to receive the harsh answers)
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
16. An estimate is not a guess because an estimate is based on some previously held information.
17.Precise
19. Objective reasoning
20.Pseudoscience
I will post the rest shortly
